Kennedy Space Center

No. Not yet.

Best we can tell, is that SpaceX and NASA are not permanently closing Playalinda Beach, but proposed launch‑related safety protocols could result in lockdowns of the area for 60–85 days yearly, raising resident concerns over tourism and the local economy. That is in the EIS Draft provided by the FAA, but nowhere in that document does it say that beach access will be permanently ended.

Still, effectively, the public could be shut out of Playalinda for 20-25% of the year once you figure in the inevitable weather scrubs that come with Florida launches.

That will have some effect on Titusville businesses and also its residents. How much remains to be seen.

What Are The Anticipated Closure Areas?

From the DRAFT EIS, Page 17 of 410:

Access restricted areas are cleared and any necessary roadblocks are established around 3 hours prior to launch/landing and dropped after the event concludes. In the event of a scrub, cleared areas and roadblocks remain until propellant is offloaded, with the duration variable depending on the percentage of propellant loaded; however, the maximum duration would be about 1 hour. Not all attempts load propellant before scrubbing and roadblocks are often dropped early.

The restricted areas shown are estimated and provide only a representative depiction; exact restricted areas would be determined prior to pre-launch activities and launch/landing. For planning purposes to support this EIS, SpaceX and NASA used conservative assumptions to develop these restricted areas. Ultimately, each restricted area is mission specific and will be determined by Range Safety and the FAA through the FAA license or license modification process.

After receiving license or license modification materials, the FAA will determine the appropriate restricted areas to protect public safety and compare those areas to the assumptions provided in the EIS. The FAA would address any discrepancies or gaps, if found, in the environmental analysis.

Static fire tests would result in restricted access to areas not currently accessible to the public and would last approximately 3 hours each time; these would mostly affect land management and mission-related activities on MINWR and KSC. Restricted access associated with launches and landings would be expanded to also affect the northern portion of CCSFS, which would include Space Launch Complex (SLC)-41 (leased to United Launch Alliance) and SLC-40, and publicly accessible areas in the southern portion of MINWR and CANA that includes Playalinda Beach. Restricted areas in areas accessible to the public would be closed to the public during the identified operations due to safety concerns. All closures, whether dictated by public safety concerns (i.e., the Range or the FAA require the closure) or by the NPS due to visitor volumes exceeding capacity, would be temporary.

While restricted access requirements are limited to the duration that the access restricted area is in effect (i.e., between 3 and 3.5 hours), the actual duration of a closure associated with publicly accessible areas may be longer due to logistical aspects. Based on information provided by the NPS, duration of closures for portions of CANA and Playalinda Beach is affected by the time of day/night that the test or launch occurs. Due to logistics of closures (e.g., NPS personnel clearing the park of visitors, etc.), midday (or later) launches or tests could result in the need to close portions of the park for the entire day; tests or launches occurring very early in the morning may result in the park being closed for a portion of the day.

Based on information provided by NPS, it is estimated that there could be between 33 and 44 (using the most conservative estimate) full-day closures and up to 33 half-day closures, which equates to up to 60.5 total “closure days” per year (44 full days + 33 half days = 60.5 “full days”). Launch scrubs and weather delays could affect the length and/or number of closures; however, the extent of these occurrences cannot be quantified at this time. Table ES-1 provides a summary of pre-launch and closure-related activities and notional closure times/durations. As mentioned previously, it is anticipated that, similar to other launch vehicles like Falcon, associated closure areas would reduce in size and duration as the program matures, more data is available, and the reliability of the vehicle improves.

Playalinda’s Role In The Titusville Economy

Playalinda and Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge are a critical component of Titusville’s economy:

Playalinda draws approximately 1.16 million of Canaveral National Seashore 2.1 million annual visitors, contributing significantly to businesses and jobs in jobs in Titusville. Visitor spending in the area totaled $62.5 million, supporting over 800 jobs and channeling an $83 million economic benefit to gateway communities like Titusville, according to numbers compiled by the National Park Service.

Talk of Titusville reached out to NASA’s Public Affairs Office for a definitive statement concerning Playalinda access, but they have not responded by press time. SpaceX has also not responded by press time either.

Congressman Mike Haridopolos of Florida’s Distric 8, which represents Titusville posted recently, “You can’t be No. 1 on Earth if you’re No. 2 in space. This executive order cuts red tape to speed up launch permits and infrastructure development for our commercial space industry,” the Indian Harbour Beach Republican said. “President Trump is cementing America’s dominance in commercial space exploration.”

Local Opposition Mounting

Local residents have been increasingly vocal about Starship, with their chief complaints being noise, sonic booms and reduced access to MINWR and Playalinda. There are numerous online chats, threads and even groups on social media — Facebook, Reddit and others where people normally gather — raising their concerns.

A new Change.org Petition started by Robyn Memphis lists their concerns about Playalinda’s future, namely that in Texas, where SpaceX is testing Starship, there is a smaller area of exclusion than the one being planned for LC-39A and Playalinda thereby.

In the petition, they take the FAA’s chart and illustrate their point:

The petition asks for the same safety exclusion distances as those used in Texas, as they have proved to be safe and effective and if matched in Florida, Playalinda access would be preserved.

“AA safety radius is 3.11 miles, yet Playalinda is outside of this radius from LC-39A and still targeted for closure, while some sites inside the hazard zone remain open. This is for convenience versus safety,” says the Petition’s authors.

Whether the opposition is a large percentage of locals is hard to say without completing a scientific poll, but simply judging by online activity, the group seems to capture a substantial portion of the local population.

Have Your Say!

No matter how you feel about the planned Starship program, Talk of Titusville urges you to make your voice heard in the final official public meetings before the Final Decision being issued.

Here are the details for the final‐draft public hearings on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for SpaceX’s Starship‑Super Heavy operations at LC‑39A:

Type Date Time Location
In-Person Tuesday
August 26, 2025
1 – 3 PM
6 – 8 PM
Astronauts Memorial Foundation, Center for Space Education, Conference Center
State Road 405
Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899
In-Person Thursday
August 28, 2025
1 – 3 PM
6 – 8 PM
Radisson Conference Center, Grande Caribbean
8701 Astronaut Boulevard
Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
Virtual Wednesday
September 3, 2025
6 – 8 PM Held via Zoom webinar; registration required
Virtual (Backup) Thursday
September 4, 2025
6 – 8 PM Backup virtual meeting in case of cancellation (same Zoom platform)

Read more

A recent Executive Order signed by President Trump aims to reshape the regulatory landscape for the U.S. commercial space industry. There are some huge potential implications for the Eastern Range in Florida — and its residents.

Titled “Enabling Competition in the Commercial Space Industry” and signed on Wednesday, August 14, 2025, the EO aims to cut through red tape, lower environmental and regulatory hurdles as well as speed up launch licensing.

The order calls for a streamlined process across multiple federal agencies to reduce delays in launch approvals, environmental reviews, and spaceport development. It also encourages deregulation of emerging space activities and infrastructure, with the goal of maintaining U.S. leadership in commercial space operations.

Some important aspects of the EO:

  • Faster environmental reviews for launch and reentry licenses.
  • Eliminating outdated regulations that hinder new space tech and infrastructure.
  • Assessing state-level barriers to spaceport development under the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA).
  • Streamlining federal reviews between NASA, Department of Defense, and Department of Transportation to remove duplication.
  • Establishing new leadership roles at the Department of Transportation and FAA to drive reform.
  • Strengthening U.S. leadership in space to stay ahead of global competitors, especially in defense, aerospace, and satellite industries.

Effects On The Eastern Range

As the world’s busiest spaceport, the new Executive Order will have an effect on both Cape Canaveral and Kennedy Space Center. Since the Eastern Range operates under coordination between the U.S. Space Force and NASA, the directive’s push for interagency alignment could help eliminate overlapping permitting processes. That may translate to fewer bureaucratic hurdles and quicker project approvals.

The Starship Tower (right) under construction at LC-39A. SpaceX has also begun construction for support facilities on Roberts Road inside KSC.
Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville

More launches means more jobs, and the Space Coast area will benefit from that. It is said that a rising tide floats all boats, and in this case, more activity on the Eastern Range will greatly benefit the area’s economy across the board.

Part 450 Changes Ordered

The Executive Order directs the DOT Secretary to reevaluate and amend or rescind 14 CFR Part 450 of Federal Aviation Administration regulations, the current regulatory structure for launch licenses and re-entries. Originally, Part 450 was intended to streamline launch and reentry in the era of commercial spaceflight, but it is widely seen as having failed to meet its objective.

Launch operators often face delays due to reviews required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). By streamlining or eliminating redundant checks, the Eastern Range could see faster launch timelines and increased throughput.

Slow and ponderous consideration and disposition of license requests have long generated complaints by operators, something the EO is designed to speed up and simplify. Details are forthcoming regarding any changes that will be made, as is the timeline for their release. At this point in time, the DOT Secretary has just received the order.

State Environmental Laws To Be Examined

The Executive Order also calls for a review of how state compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) may be affecting spaceport development. This review could lead to reduced friction between Florida’s regulatory agencies and federal space operators, potentially easing constraints on new infrastructure.

If implemented, the changes could allow companies such as Blue Origin, SpaceX, Firefly, and Relativity Space to expand more rapidly and with greater ease. With fewer regulatory delays, the Eastern Range could support more launch pads, more missions, which would bring additional economic activity in the region.

Blue Origin New Glenn launch
Blue Origin’s New Glenn on its debut launch in January. Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville

On the other hand, more launches, more launch pads, and fewer regulations might put an additional burden on already strained resources in the region. Port Canaveral, for example, is nearly bursting at the seams with cruise ship business, freighters, and in the past ten years, SpaceX returning boosters to port regularly.

The Local Effect

Local residents will hear the roar of rocket launches more often, and as the industry shifts towards rocket reusability generally, they will will hear more sonic booms when spacecraft return to The Cape. SpaceX, for example, is planning dozens of flights a year of its new Starship Heavy when it goes operational, and each booster return to launch site mission will have a sonic boom. There will be a second sonic boom after the given mission’s conclusion and the Ship — the second stage and payload bay for Starship — returns to land at The Cape as well.

While space launch activities are not a particularly large contributor to pollutants in the Indian River Lagoon, there is always the possibility of a spill or leak from support infrastructure or during construction. More activity means more opportunity for that to happen, though it should also be said in the same breath that does not mean it will happen, but instead, that it could. NASA, the Space Force and launch companies are very good stewards of their facilities and surrounding land, and the KSC/CCSFS area is a bright spot for wildlife and fauna in the Space Coast region.

Bottom line is that there are many other pain points and growth issues at the Eastern Range, all of which will need to be remediated as growth there continues.

What About The LC-39A and LC-37 Environmental Studies Underway?

This Executive Order could potentially affect Starship’s development at Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A) and Launch Complex 37 (LC-37), but how much depends on how the implementing agencies interpret the “streamline environmental reviews” directive.

Both LC-39A and LC-37 are currently in the middle of Environmental Impact Studies (EISs) with final drafts expected in the coming months. After that, Final Decisions on both sites will be rendered, and given the ongoing construction at LC-39A for Starship, it would appear that the decisions are fait accompli and that Starship will be a regular on The Cape’s launch calendar.

The Executive Order specifically directs the Secretary of Transportation (through the FAA’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation) to eliminate or expedite environmental reviews for launch and reentry licenses. In theory, this could allow the FAA to shorten the review process, remove redundant steps, or rely on less time-intensive environmental assessments instead of full EISs.

However, EIS timelines are also influenced by other agencies—including NASA (which owns LC-39A) and the U.S. Space Force (which oversees LC-37 at Cape Canaveral). The EO also instructs these agencies to align their processes and eliminate duplication, which could expedite the process if multiple reviews are being conducted for the same project. Whether this will affect the two EISs that are nearing their final phases is an open question. It would seem that the studies are already completed and that final reports and decisions on adoption are not far away.

One complicating factor: environmental review requirements come from statute (NEPA) as well as agency policy. The EO can direct agencies to streamline within the law, but it can’t waive NEPA entirely. That means some level of review is still required, especially for projects with substantial potential environmental such as methane-fueled launches. Stoke Space, Relativity and other launch vendors might see some benefit. SpaceX probably won’t need it.

At the end of the day, it’s fair to say that the new Executive Order is smoothing the path for growth that was already coming, and that it will limit the ability of outside organizations (like environmental groups) to have much effect on decision-making regarding space launches. Whether that is a good thing remains to be seen.

Read more

Jim Lovell in the Apollo era.
Photo: NASA

Captain James A. “Jim” Lovell Jr., the NASA astronaut who commanded the the Apollo 13 mission and became a symbol of courage and ingenuity, died Thursday at the age of 97 in Lake Forest, Illinois. Lovell’s death was confirmed by family members.

Born March 25, 1928, in Cleveland, Ohio, Lovell logged more than 700 hours in space over four missions. His calm under pressure during Apollo 13—immortalized by the phrase “Houston, we’ve had a problem”—cemented his place in history. Lovell was, as one former NASA engineer told us, “a cool customer.”

While he and his family were never Space Coast residents, Lovell still had deep connections to the area, dating back to the mid-1960s when, as a member of NASA’s “Next Nine” astronaut class.

His first mission, Gemini 7 in 1965, launched from Cape Canaveral’s Launch Complex 19, set a then-record for space endurance. More importantly, GEmini 7 was part of the first orbital rendezvous between two crewed spacecraft. Gemini 6A,  piloted by Wally Schirra and Tom Stafford, and Gemini 7 achieved an orbital rendezvous. 

Many overlook the importance of Gemini 7 and 6A: they proved NASA’s capability to calculate and coordinate two spacecraft in flight, and therefore that the Apollo capsule (CSM) and lander (LM) could rendezvous and dock. While today, those maneuvers are a routine part of any crewed mission, the two Gemini flights were the first actually to do it. And that with mid-1960’s computing power, meaning that the calculations were largely done by hand and that at great pace.

The Gemini 7 Astronauts: Jim Lovell, left, and Frank Borman, right. Photo: NASA

Lovell would return to Florida’s coast for the launch of Gemini 12 in 1966. The last flight of the Gemini program, he commanded the mission with Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin as his co-pilot. The pair rendezvoused and docked with a target vehicle, and that mission served to further NASA’s and America’s confidence in the spaceflight capabilities of their program.

While those flights were record-breaking, Lovell’s best-known flights were on Apollo 8 in 1968—the first human flight around the Moon, and later, Apollo 13. Gemini proved that Lovell was a cool customer and an incredible space jockey, but the Apollo flights turned him into a legendary hero.

On Apollo 8, Lovell served as the Command Module Pilot. Apollo 8 was a daring mission: the first crewed mission to leave Earth orbit, the first humans to escape Earth’s gravity, the first to orbit another celestial body, and at the time, the farthest humans had ever traveled away from their home planet. Apollo 8 also set a record for re-entry speed after completing its mission. Jim Lovell drove.

Launched from Kennedy Space Center on December 21, 1968, the mission was a bold response to the Soviet Union’s lunar efforts. The Russian program was rumored to be preparing a circumlunar crewed Zond mission to beat NASA and the Americans to the moon, and snatching away another space record from America’s grasp. That would have been yet another coup for the Soviets and yet another crushing defeat for the United States on the global stage.

Four months before launch, Apollo 8’s mission plan was changed, and a lot of chips were pushed into the middle of the table by NASA and the Johnson administration.

With Commander Frank Borman focusing on overall mission leadership and Lunar Module Pilot Bill Anders focused on photography and scientific observations, Lovell’s primary responsibility was navigation and spacecraft systems management. His expertise was crucial in ensuring the spacecraft, Columbia, stayed on the correct trajectory during its unprecedented journey to lunar orbit. Lovell was in charge of getting Apollo 8 there and back.

During the mission, he handled much of the celestial navigation, using stars and onboard instruments to verify the spacecraft’s position and the accuracy of on-board computers. This was critical when Apollo 8 entered lunar orbit on December 24, 1968, becoming the first crewed spacecraft to do so. Shortly afterwards, they were the first humans to ever lay their eyes on the far side of the moon.

Lovell’s steady performance during complex orbital maneuvers gave mission control the confidence to execute the burns that allowed the crew to circle the Moon ten times. His navigational skill ensured the spacecraft maintained its proper course for both the lunar operations and the eventual return trip.

Lovell also served as the mission’s communicator within the crew, reading from the Book of Genesis during the Christmas Eve broadcast viewed by millions around the world.

When Apollo 8 successfully fired its engine to break free of lunar orbit on December 25 and head back to Earth, Lovell’s precision and calm professionalism played a vital role in ensuring the maneuver was executed flawlessly. Apollo 8’s success paved the way for the Moon landing just seven months later, and Lovell’s performance cemented his reputation as one of NASA’s most reliable and skilled astronauts.

Contemporary documentary of the Apollo 8 mission

As daring and accomplished as Apollo 8 was, it was eclipsed quickly by Apollo 11 and later, Apollo 13, but it should not be overlooked. Apollo 8 is probably the most daring spaceflight NASA has ever flown.

“I was asked to escort Charles Lindbergh to watch the launch of Apollo 11,” Jim Lovell once related, “As we listened to the countdown, I said, ‘Take a look at that Saturn V rocket. The spacecraft on top will try to land on the Moon.” But I could tell he was in deep thought, his mind elsewhere. I suspected he was thinking of his own voyage, that perilous 34-hour overwater flight from New York to Paris.”

“Suddenly he answered, “Apollo 11 will be quite an accomplishment. But your flight–Apollo 8– that initial 240,000-mile voyage from the Earth to the Moon. That’s the flight I will remember.”

Lovell and Lindbergh were two of a kind.

Apollo 13

Lovell is well known as the commander of Apollo 13, NASA’s third planned lunar landing mission. Launched from Kennedy Space Center on April 11, 1970, with Command Module Pilot Jack Swigert and Lunar Module Pilot Fred Haise, the crew’s primary objective was to land in the Fra Mauro highlands of the Moon. That was not to be.

The Apollo 13 Crew after successfully landing in 1970.
Photo: NASA

Two days into the mission, an oxygen tank in the Service Module exploded, crippling the spacecraft. While the event was unfolding and all hell was breaking loose, Lovell’s calm voice relaying, “Houston, we’ve had a problem,” became an enduring symbol of composure under pressure. As commander, he was immediately responsible for diagnosing the situation alongside Mission Control and determining how to keep his crew alive with rapidly diminishing resources.

The explosion left the Command Module without enough power, heat, or oxygen to support the crew for the trip home, forcing Lovell, his crewmates and ground controllers to make quick, calculated decisions under extreme stress, all to keep Apollo 13’s capsule from turning into an icy tomb for the three astronauts. They did just that in what may be NASA’s finest hour. Lovell was front and center.

A photo of the damaged Apollo 13 Service Module after it was jettisoned before the capsule re-entered Earth’s atmosphere. Photo: NASA, Reprocessed by Andy Saunders.

One of his most critical calls was to use the Lunar Module, Aquarius, as a “lifeboat.” This shift required rerouting power, conserving water, and relying on limited life-support systems never designed for the full crew over such a long duration. Lovell coordinated with flight controllers in Houston to develop new procedures for navigation and course corrections, all while managing the psychological and physical strain on himself and his crew.

Perhaps Lovell’s most remarkable feat in space was his role in guiding Apollo 13’s manual course corrections. Without a functioning navigation computer in the Command Module, Lovell had to align the spacecraft using Earth’s position in the window and fire the Lunar Module’s descent engine at precise moments. These maneuvers, executed flawlessly, ensured the spacecraft stayed on a trajectory that would safely bring it back to Earth. The accuracy of these burns, given the limited tools available, remains one of the most celebrated acts of piloting in space history.

The Apollo 13 crew being interviewed in 1970 by Johnny Carson

By April 17, 1970, Lovell had successfully brought his crew home, splashing down safely in the Pacific Ocean. While Apollo 13 never landed on the Moon, the mission became known as a “successful failure” because of the safe return against all the odds.

Much of that success is credited to Lovell’s steady leadership, problem-solving skills, and ability to maintain composure under life-threatening conditions. His role in Apollo 13 is often cited as one of the finest examples of crisis management in the history of human spaceflight.

To be sure, everyone involved pitched in with every bit of their vigor and considerable skill, and Jim Lovell would have been the first to tell you that. In fact, he always did, showing hius stellar leadership long after Apollo 13.

After NASA

Lovell retired from NASA and the U.S. Navy in 1973, but he frequently returned to Florida for anniversaries, commemorations, and educational events. He co-authored Lost Moon: The Perilous Voyage of Apollo 13, which inspired the 1995 film Apollo 13. In later years, he appeared at Kennedy Space Center events to discuss the mission’s lessons in leadership and resilience as well as meeting members of an adoring public.

Lovell is survived by his four children: Barbara Harrison, James Lovell III, Susan Lovell, and Jeffrey Lovell, along with 11 grandchildren and 7 great-grandchildren. His wife Marilyn passed away in 2023.

charlesboyer61
Read more

Starship Heavy lifts off from Boca Chica, Texas to start the IFT-6 mission. Photo: Richard Gallagher, FMN
Starship Heavy lifts off from Boca Chica, Texas to start the IFT-6 mission. Photo: Richard Gallagher, FMN
Starship Heavy lifts off from Boca Chica, Texas to start the IFT-6 mission. Photo: Richard Gallagher, FMN

The Federal Aviation Administration has released the long-awaited draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) evaluating SpaceX’s plan to launch its Starship-Super Heavy rocket from Launch Complex 39A at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center. The report concludes that the proposed operations would not result in significant environmental harm, paving the way for a positive finding for the company in the final document, due sometime late this year.

According to the draft EIS, the FAA determined that impacts from launch operations such as noise, sonic booms, and visual disturbances—would be “less than significant” when evaluated in the context of the surrounding spaceport and existing activity.

Still, the report acknowledges potential stressors to wildlife, including bald eagles, sea turtles, manatees, and migratory birds, especially during nesting seasons. The closest bald eagle nest is roughly 2.5 miles from the proposed Starship launch pad. In between, another avian raptor, ospreys, probably have dozens of nests. The FAA, in coordination with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and other agencies, has initiated formal consultations under the Endangered Species Act and other environmental protections.

The Reports

Instead of one single document, the FAA released 28, and are linked below.

According the FAA:

“The FAA is releasing the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for SpaceX’s proposed licensing and operation of the Starship Super-Heavy vehicle at Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A) at Kennedy Space Center (KSC) (Draft EIS). The National Aeronautics and Aerospace Administration (NASA), the Department of the Air Force (DAF), the United Stated Coast Guard (USCG), the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the National Park Service (NPS) are cooperating agencies.”

Public Hearings Announced

The FAA is now accepting public comments on the draft EIS, with a public comment period open through September 22, 2025. Four in-person meetings and one virtual session have been scheduled:

  • August 26, 2025 — 1:00–3:00 PM and 5:00–7:00 PM at Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex
  • August 28, 2025 — 1:00–3:00 PM and 5:00–7:00 PM at Cape Canaveral Public Library
  • September 3, 2025 — Virtual public meeting (details available on the FAA’s website)

Members of the public and local stakeholders are encouraged to provide feedback. Other than written feedback, this will be the last public opportunity for the public to enter its feedback into the process.

What Happens Next

After the public comment period closes, the FAA will review all input, complete consultations with relevant federal and state agencies, and prepare a final EIS.

Only then will it decide on whether to issue a launch license to SpaceX. The FAA also noted that a completed EIS does not guarantee license approval—SpaceX must still meet all safety, risk, and indemnification standards under federal law.

If approved, Starship operations at Kennedy Space Center would mark a significant expansion of the company’s heavy-lift launch capabilities in Florida, complementing its existing activities in Texas.

Read more

SpaceX, NASA and the Crew 11 astronauts beat the clouds and rain showers and launched before summer showers washed over Kennedy Space Center today, but just barely. With dark skies and rain rapidly advancing from the south, liftoff of SpaceX’s 18th crewed flight was at 11:43 AM ET from venerable Launch Complex 39A. Crew 11’s four astronauts are now on their way to the International Space Station after today’s launch, with an expected arrival time at the orbital outpost around 3 AM ET tomorrow, August 2.

Gravity Turn: After Max-Q and now in its supersonic flight phase, Falcon 9 enters another gear, leaving the contrail it just made behind quickly. The cloud is from the rocket, not the storms it was escaping on August 1, 2025.
Read more

Crew 11 ascending to orbit on August 1, 2025. Photo: Charles Boyer
Crew 11 rising into the clouds that threatened to force a second launch scrub on August 1, 2025
Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville

SpaceX, NASA and the Crew 11 astronauts beat the clouds and rain showers today, but just barely. With dark skies and rain rapidly advancing from the south, liftoff of SpaceX’s 18th crewed flight was at 11:43 AM ET from Launch Complex 39A from Kennedy Space Center. Crew 11’s four astronauts are now on their way the International Space Station, with an expected arrival time at the orbital outpost around 3AM ET tomorrow, August 2.

It didn’t look like much at first, but the approaching storms from the south would soon cover the launch pad. Had they been a couple minutes faster, there would have been a second launch scrub in as many days
for Crew 11.
Photo: Charles Boyer

The countdown today was a near carbon copy of yesterday’s: picture perfect with few if any issues until the last half hour. At that time, with afternoon temperatures rising into what is best called “miserable”, coastal winds started to rise up in the atmosphere, creating clouds that would grow into rain showers and later, thunderstorms. Yesterday, the clouds were too close to LC-39A and caused a launch scrub because of a weather violation. Today, with a Phase 1 lightning issued only minutes before, the burgeoning showers stayed just far enough away to allow the countdown to proceed and liftoff to occur on schedule.

Making Its Own Clouds
Crew 11 left quite a post-Max Q contrail today on its way to orbit. The “cloud” below the rocket is actually Falcon 9’s, and one that expanded even more rapidly than the deteriorating weather.
Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville

Later, when Booster 1094 returned to Landing Zone 1 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station rather quietly — from the vantage of the KSC Press Site, the descending booster was hidden in the clouds until the very last, appearing only a second or two before it’s final landing burn began. The normal sonic boom was muted too, and was nowhere near as loud as normal. Today’s landing marks the last at Landing Zone 1 as SpaceX prepares to move Falcon 9 landing operations to a new area nearly adjacent to Space Launch Complex 40.

Meanwhile, the second stage and astronauts aboard Crew Dragon Endeavour continued on their way to orbit, which they achieved at the T+ 00:08:46 mark. At T+ 09:36, Crew Dragon separated from Falcon 9’s second stage.

On Their Way To ISS

Now in orbit, Crew 11 will begin chasing down ISS in earnest, with an expected arrival time around 3 AM ET on August 2nd.

After docking, the station’s total crew will climb to 11 for a brief period as they join current occupants: NASA astronauts Anne McClain, Nichole Ayers, and Jonny Kim; JAXA astronaut Takuya Onishi; and Roscosmos cosmonauts Kirill Peskov, Sergey Ryzhikov, and Alexey Zubritsky.

Crew-10, the previous NASA-SpaceX mission, will remain aboard for a short handover after Crew-11 arrives, then return to Earth. Before their departure, mission teams will monitor weather conditions at designated splashdown zones off the California coast to ensure a safe landing.

Crew-11’s mission focuses heavily on scientific research supporting long-duration human spaceflight and applications on Earth. Their work includes simulating lunar landings, studying how to protect astronauts’ vision in space, and advancing human spaceflight research through NASA’s Human Research Program. Additional experiments will explore plant cell division, the impact of microgravity on virus-bacteria interactions, and methods to produce more human stem cells and generate nutrients on demand.

Crew 11’s astronauts preparing to depart for the launch pad early in the morning on August 1.
Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville

Read more

Crew 8 on the pad at LC-39A.
Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville

NASA and SpaceX are finalizing preparations for the launch of Crew-11, the next long-duration mission to the International Space Station (ISS), currently targeted for Thursday, July 31, 2025, at 12:09 PM ET from Launch Complex 39A at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The crew members arrived yesterday at KSC, and are undergoing their final preparations for Wednesday’s launch.

The mission will send four astronauts to the ISS aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, flying the Crew Dragon Endeavour spacecraft on its sixth voyage to orbit. The launch marks the eleventh operational crew rotation flight under NASA’s Commercial Crew Program.

Should weather or technical issues delay the liftoff, NASA and SpaceX have identified Thursday, August 1, as the primary backup launch opportunity, with a similar afternoon launch window.

Leading the Mission: Commander Zena Cardman

At the helm of Crew-11 is NASA astronaut Zena Cardman, making her first journey into space. Selected by NASA in 2017, Cardman holds degrees in biology and marine science from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Prior to her astronaut career, she conducted research in microbial ecology and geobiology—skills that align closely with her role in conducting biological experiments on the ISS.

Commander Zena Cardman speaking Saturday after the Crew 11 astronauts arrived at Kennedy Space Center
Photo: Eric A. Moore/Florida Media Now

A Veteran Returns: Mike Fincke

Seated beside Cardman in the pilot’s chair is veteran astronaut Mike Fincke. A retired U.S. Air Force colonel and flight test engineer, Fincke has already logged more than 381 days in space across two ISS expeditions and one space shuttle mission. He has also completed nine spacewalks.

Astronaut Mike Fincke in a Russian Orlan suit during an EVA.
Photo: NASA

Originally assigned to the Boeing Starliner program, Fincke was the backup astronaut attached the the Crew Flight Test of Starliner that resulted in the unexpectedly long stay aboard ISS for astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore.

Finke was reassigned to Crew-11 after the return of Starliner, and commercial crew schedule adjustments were made thanks to delays introduced by the CFT problems. His experience provides invaluable backup for the relatively newer members of the team, and his familiarity with long-duration spaceflight is expected to be critical in managing station operations and mentoring the crew aboard.

Representing Japan: Kimiya Yui

Kimiya Yui.
Photo: ESA

JAXA astronaut Kimiya Yui returns to orbit for his second flight, having previously served aboard the ISS in 2015 during Expedition 44/45. Yui, a former fighter pilot in the Japan Air Self-Defense Force, was instrumental in setting up Japan’s Kibo laboratory module during his first mission. On Crew-11, he’ll continue that legacy by supporting international science initiatives and representing Japan’s contributions to the station’s operations.

A Russian Debut: Oleg Platonov

Oleg Platonov
Photo: Credit: IMAGO/ITAR-TASS

Rounding out the crew is Oleg Platonov, a first-time space traveler from Russia’s Roscosmos agency. Platonov, an aerospace engineer and former Air Force officer, was initially scheduled to fly on a Soyuz mission but joined Crew-11 under a seat-swap agreement between NASA and Roscosmos.

Despite political tensions on Earth, Platonov’s role highlights the ongoing collaboration between the United States and Russia in maintaining the ISS as a platform for peaceful international science and exploration.

Once At ISS

Once aboard the ISS, the crew will take part in Expeditions 73 and 74, diving into hundreds of research projects ranging from plant biology to space manufacturing to human health in microgravity. The mission also serves as preparation for the Artemis program, as NASA continues to build systems and experience for future lunar missions.

Dragon Endeavour, making its sixth flight, adds another chapter to its legacy as the most frequently reused crew spacecraft in NASA’s current fleet. If all goes according to plan, Crew-11 will return to Earth in April 2026 with a splashdown in the Pacific Ocean.

ISS
Photo: NASA
Read more

Tempus fugit, a lot of clocks say: “time is fleeting.” For a facility as established and enduring as Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, it might seem like forever since the first rocket launched from here. Time has flown and so have thousands of rockets and missiles from America’s premier spaceport. Truth is, CCSFS has been open “only” 75 years, but it continues to have a bright future not only today but also for the long-term future.

Read more

July 11, 2025: it’s been over a year since the public scoping period for the FAA’s Environmental Impact Statement, and no Draft EIS or even a date for one has been announced for SpaceX’s Starship-Super Heavy project at Launch Complex 39A at KSC.

Casual onlookers may wonder if something is awry, but that’s probably not the case. The wheels of government turn slowly and often do so silently, and an announcement could come any day.

Two Separate Facilities, Two Seperate EIS

Many people who don’t live at the Space Coast don’t realize that Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station are two adjoining but separately managed facilities. NASA operates KSC, of course, and SpaceX leases LC-39A from the government at KSC. Cape Canaveral SFS, located southeast of Kennedy, is a US Space Force Military facility and is operated by the Department of the Air Force. SpaceX leases SLC-40 at CCSFS and seeks to lease LC-37 there.

There are even gates between the two facilities, though they don’t seem to ever close. There is great cooperation between the Space Force and NASA, and they often work together when needed.

That’s important, because there are two authorities conducting two Environmental Impact Statements for two different launch pads: LC-37 and LC-39A. The former is the retired site of United Launch Alliance’s Delta IV Heavy rocket, which flew its last flight last year.

The latter, LC-39A, is of course the historic launch facility that served Apollo and STS (Shuttle) missions in its long and storied career. SpaceX has made their own history at LC-39A: the return of crew to orbit after a long gap following the end of the Shuttle program, the launch site of Falcon Heavy and other commercial spaceflight firsts.

Current Status

The EIS process for LC-39A continues to be underway. No statements otherwise have been released by any of the parties involved, so it is safe to say that work is continuing.

SpaceX is preparing the EIS under FAA supervision, analyzing the environmental impacts of proposed Starship-Super Heavy operations, including up to 44 launches per year, infrastructure construction; a Super Heavy booster catch tower, propellant systems, and stormwater/deluge ponds), and landings at LC-39A or on a droneship.

The process is evaluating changes from the 2019 Environmental Assessment (EA), which found no significant impact but did not account for the current scope of operations. The next step is the release of the draft EIS for public review and comment, followed by a final EIS and a Record of Decision.

Release Date of the LC-39A Draft EIS

There is no specific release date publicly announced for the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for SpaceX’s Starship-Super Heavy project at LC-39A at Kennedy Space Center. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) initiated the EIS process with a Notice of Intent published on May 9, 2024, and held public scoping meetings in June 2024.

Based on typical EIS timelines (often 12-18 months) and the FAA’s ongoing work, the draft EIS is likely to be released in mid-to-late 2025. For comparison, the draft EIS for Starship launches at Space Launch Complex 37 (SLC-37) at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station was released on June 6, 2025, after a scoping period starting in February 2024, fifteen months earlier. The LC-39A EIS Draft should come in the next 5-6 months, or roughly the same time as a final decision on LC-37 is due, according to DAF project timelines.

New Federal NEPA Rules

The FAA has issued a notice rescinding its existing National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) implementing procedures outlined in FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, and replacing them with streamlined procedures in FAA Order 1050.1G. This change is driven by Executive Order 14154 of the President, entitled “Unleashing American Energy.”

The new order accelerates environmental reviews projects by imposing strict timelines and page limits on EISs (e.g., 2-year completion cap), expanding CATEX (Categorical Exclusion) usage, allowing combined exclusions, and promoting early collaboration to minimize delays. This aligns with the Trump Administration’s policy to expedite permitting. That could potentially benefit commercial space operators like SpaceX by shortening review periods for future licenses or modifications, thus supporting faster integration of technologies like Starship.

However, for the specific ongoing EIS for SpaceX’s Starship-Super Heavy operations at LC-39A, the new rules should not apply directly. Order 1050.1G applies only to FAA actions requiring environmental review that “commence on or after” July 3, 2025, and since the LC-39A EIS was started in 2024, the new order is moot.

Responsible Agencies

There is a mix of federal agencies responsible for completing aspects of the LC-39A EIS.

Lead Agency: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), responsible for overseeing the EIS process and issuing a commercial launch Vehicle Operator License to SpaceX if the final decision of the EIS is to allow work on 39A to proceed.

Preparing Entity: SpaceX, tasked with preparing the EIS under FAA supervision.

Multiple Cooperating Agencies:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): Manages KSC and leases LC-39A to SpaceX, providing oversight for space-related activities.permits.performance.gov

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS): Manages the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, which includes KSC property, and provides expertise on wildlife impacts.permits.performance.gov

National Park Service (NPS): Oversees Canaveral National Seashore, partially within KSC boundaries, and contributes expertise on affected lands.permits.

U.S. Coast Guard (USCG): Involved due to maritime safety and airspace closures for launches.

Department of the Air Force (DAF): Coordinates due to proximity to Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and shared range.

For the most current LC-39A information, check the FAA’s website (www.faa.gov) or the project-specific page at :

https://www.faa.gov/space/stakeholder_engagement/spacex_starship_ksc

For the most current LC-37 information the Department of the Air Force maintains an informational site at:

https://spaceforcestarshipeis.com/

Read more

KSCVC rendering of the newly updated Gantry at LC-39A

The Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex has expanded its popular bus tour to include The Gantry at Launch Complex 39—a multi-level attraction nestled inside KSC that was updated and upgraded over the past several months.

Perched just 1.5 miles from LC-39A and 2.25 miles from LC-39B—the primary pads for NASA’s Artemis lunar missions—The Gantry offers a front-row seat to the agency’s current and future launch operations. Guests will find four stories of interactive exhibits, an Earth Information Center that explores how space science benefits life on our planet, and carefully preserved artifacts from NASA’s storied past.

No word has been given about launch viewing at the site. LC-39A and LC-39B are too close, of course, as there is at least a 3.5 mile exclusion area surrounding each pad and The Gantry will be too close for viewers. In the past, The Gantry has hosted spectators for launches from ULA’s pad at LC-41 and SpaceX’s pad at SLC-40 on Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and given them a point blank (relatively speaking) view of the launch equal to what the working press sees.

An Atlas V launch as seen from The Gantry
Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville

Static Fire Simulator

For years, The Gantry had a real flight-worthy Aerojet-Rocketdyne RS-25 engine on display — one where users could get a close view of the engines that powered the launches of space shuttle orbiters and SLS rockets. When the Artemis program got started in earnest, that display was removed, leaving a huge hole in each level of The Gantry. That has been replaced by a new Static Fire simulator.

The new simulator, unique to The Gantry, recreates the moment a rocket engine fires for a ground test. Under the guidance of a NASA engineer and an on-site AI assistant named Sōl, visitors will witness an amplified demonstration: a 30-minute countdown culminates in a dramatic eruption of noise, light and cooling fog.

Education Is A Prominent Display At The Gantry

The Gantry’s designers also emphasize education. From its vantage point, guests can gaze across the wildlife refuge’s swamps and scrublands to active launch pads at both Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. Interactive displays illustrate how each mission contributes to our understanding of Earth’s climate, ecosystems and natural resources.

For more information, contact the Kennedy Space Center Visitors Center.

Read more