A Russian Soyuz rocket lifted a three person crew into orbit early Thursday, carrying one NASA astronaut and two Roscosmos cosmonauts to the International Space Station. Their arrival boosts the station’s population to ten as Expedition 73 prepares for its upcoming crew rotation and a busy stretch of science work.
On October 4, 1957, the Space Age began in earnest: on that day, the Soviet Union orbited Sputnik 1, shocking the world and especially the United States. Sputnik was flying overhead, the Russians were having a propaganda feast, and military leaders were confronting a sobering new reality.
Fear and anger washed over the West. If the Soviet Union could orbit the entire planet, then their missiles could strike any target any place in the world too. Suddenly, the Cold War was a lot colder. Nobody was safe. Anywhere.
Then came the questions: Were the Russians that far ahead of everyone, especially the US? Could America have orbited a satellite first? Then, of course, the biggest question, the one that was usually shouted: What are we going to do about it?
The answer to the last question was to orbit our own artificial moon, or satellite. Soon.
The answers to the other questions are nuanced. The US was indeed capable, and could have been the first to orbit, probably. Even if it had, America was still technically behind the Russians, who could loft more mass than the US.
From the convenience of the hindsight offered by history, the short answer is technically that the United States rocket probably could have won the race to orbit, but politically, not under President Dwight D. Eisenhower.
Eisenhower deliberately chose a civilian path to America’s first satellite to set a crucial legal precedent for future reconnaissance, and he kept the Army’s rocket team (ABMA) on a tight leash until after Sputnik flew. Meanwhile, the Army had nearly complete orbit-capable rockets stored in an Alabama warehouse long before October 4, 1957, and the launch of Sputnik 1. Eisenhower sidelined them.
Years before Sputnik, Eisenhower was already pursuing reconnaissance satellites. In 1954, he had established The Killian Panel to devise technology for global intelligence gathering that would reduce the possibility of a surprise nuclear attack. The result was an initial concept for the WS-117L reconnaissance satellite program, which the Air Force began in earnest in 1956, with the result being the first American spy satellites.
Eisenhower’s advisers worried before Sputnik that if the United States put a military satellite such as a WS-117L spacecraft over other countries first, it could trigger diplomatic protests that outer space was sovereign airspace above each nation below.
To negate this idea, the White House therefore backed a civilian International Geophysical Year (IGY) satellite using the Navy’s Vanguard, precisely to establish the norm that satellites could lawfully overfly national territory—a principle dubbed “freedom of space.”
When Sputnik crossed American skies without international protest, Eisenhower saw that the norm was effectively validated. The concept of “Freedom of space” remains relevant to this day. So do reconnaissance satellites.
The firestorm was intense and instantaneous. ‘America,’ many political commentators said, ‘cannot let this stand.’
Publicly, the President downplayed Sputnik’s military significance but privately, he took it as a useful assist to the overflight precedent he wanted for reconnaissance. The punch certainly stung, but Eisenhower, ever the cagey strategist rolled with it.
It took Eisenhower four days to order an acceleration of the first U.S. launch. On Oct. 8, 1957, he directed the Pentagon to ready the Army Ballistic Missile Agency (ABMA) to orbit a satellite; the formal go-ahead arrived in Huntsville on Nov. 8. Explorer 1 flew on Jan. 31, 1958.
“The Redstone flew in ’53 the first time, and even before that, in about ’52, von Braun and I met each other in the hallway one day, and just in passing, he said to me, “With the Redstone we can do it.”
“I was dumb enough. I said, “Do what?”
“He said, “Launch a satellite, of course.”
— Dr. Ernst Stuhlinger, in a NASA Oral History
From a technical standpoint, the Army’s Jupiter-C was close to being an orbital launcher. But “close” is not “on the pad.” Juno did not have a flight-ready payload assembled and qualified, nor had it been authorized for an orbital mission. The ABMA team was dealt out despite holding the best hand at the table. Moreover, the orbital configuration’s design existed, had even been flight tested, but had never, of course, gone into orbit.
In 1956–57, Jupiter-C performed high-altitude nose-cone tests and ABMA and JPL engineers knew that adding a small fourth stage a small payload could reach orbital velocity—the configuration that lofted Explorer 1. In those earlier tests, the highest stage was intentionally “dead” (often described as being ballasted with sand) to prevent any accidental satellite. Those were orders, not a lack of know-how. The fourth stage would have to wait.
One of the enduring stories claims ABMA had “orbit-capable rockets sitting in a warehouse” before Oct. 4, 1957. There is a kernel of truth wrapped in myth that has become legend.
ABMA did keep Jupiter-C hardware available from its nose-cone test series in storage in Huntsville, and senior Army leaders argued they could orbit a small satellite quickly if authorized. Those rockets were, of course, in Alabama, and not here in Florida, where they would eventually launch.
Later accounts (and Army memoirs) recall these “surplus” Jupiter-C vehicles “on the shelf” and describe efforts to ensure no accidental orbital launches resulted during previous test flights.
“Tucked away inside the Jupiter-C program was a well-known secret agenda to assemble one of these vehicles with a 4th stage that could place a small object into orbit about the earth. One of the Jupiter-Cs received special handling and security. When we conducted the SFT, which included testing all the electronics necessary to activate the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stages, the Commanding General and Dr. von Braun were on hand to observe the test.
“When that test was completed, the whole assembly was wrapped and carried to a sealed hanger to await the possible permission to orbit a satellite.”
Willie (Bil) Weaver, Stories from NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center: The Jupiter-C Rocket and Explorer-1 Satellite
That supports the notion of ready hardware—but not a complete, cleared satellite mission waiting only for a countdown. Some final preparations would be needed. A payload needed to be designed, built and tested. The rockets would need to be transported to the Cape, they’d need to be prepared, tested, payload installed, tested some more, taken out to the launch pad then prepared to launch, etc. before finally flying. Once flying, telemetry would need to be monitored, a global task then involving international cooperation and even ships placed at points mid-ocean.
Those preparations are demanding and exacting and encountering problems during a launch campaign is almost expected. Especially when it is your first time doing it.
On December 6, 1957, the US made its first reply to the Soviet feat.
Here at Cape Canaveral, Vanguard Test Vehicle-3 (TV-3) managed to rise only about 4 feet before it lost power. The rocket then collapsed back onto the launch pad and detonated in a tremendous fireball. It was a highly visible and embarrassing setback for the US.
Newspapers derided the failure with nicknames like “Flopnik” and “Kaputnik,” playing off the Soviets’ Sputnik triumph. Though the Vanguard payload was hurled clear of the blast and later recovered, it was too damaged for any further use. The rocket was in thousands of pieces and for it, there was no repair. For the time being, Vanguard was out. Redstone and ABMA were the US best hope to reply to the Soviet Union.
Now tasked to orbit a satellite after Sputnik, ABMA and JPL went to work as preparations for another Vanguard attempt continued elsewhere. The ABMA / JPL teams fielded the Juno I / Explorer 1 booster and satellite combination and launched successfully on Jan. 31, 1958.
If that sounds simple, it wasn’t. VL Pinson, Sr., an ABMA employee then located here in Cocoa said, “We checked, then we rechecked, then we checked again. When we were asleep we were dreaming about what we should check the next day. Everything had to be right.”
Turned out, the ABMA and JPL team did a whale of a good job. They successfully launched to orbit on their first try, a feat that even today is notable. In 1957, it was an incredible achievement.
That mission is obviously the stuff of legend: in 119 days, the United States joined the Soviet Union as a spacefaring nation. While the two countries had launched “scientific” satellites, the meaning was very clear to military leaders from both sides of the Iron Curtain: either side can strike the other at any place and at any time. The reality of Mutual Assured Destruction was coming quickly into focus.
The speed of the ABMA Juno-1 turnaround underscores how mature the hardware was—but also that it was policy, final approvals and geopolitical gamesmanship that stood between Huntsville and an actual pre-Sputnik orbit.
There are a lot of ifs, but yes, under different political circumstances, the US probably would have beaten Sputnik 1.
If Washington had chosen the Army’s route in 1955–56 instead of Vanguard, the U.S. might have launched first. ABMA and its Redstone family were farther down its development timeline, its team more experienced, and its platform more robust. Its chances of success were always higher than Vanguard.
On the surface, that might suggest the US backed the wrong horse. Still, Eisenhower’s decision to support the Vanguard program was strategic and never careless: it prioritized a civilian image and the overflight precedent essential for the reconnaissance satellites that his administration was already developing.
So, sometimes when you lose, you win.
As NASA’s own history notes, the administration viewed Sputnik less as a military threat than as an (unwelcome) but useful boost to establishing “freedom of space.” Once that point of international law was established, Eisenhower unleashed Huntsville and JPL—and Explorer 1 was in orbit within weeks. And not so long afterward,
The Space Age was born and the starting gun for the Space Race had been fired…twice. The world and especially the areas around Cape Canaveral would never be the same.
SpaceX, NASA and the Crew 11 astronauts beat the clouds and rain showers today, but just barely. With dark skies and rain rapidly advancing from the south, liftoff of SpaceX’s 18th crewed flight was at 11:43 AM ET from Launch Complex 39A from Kennedy Space Center. Crew 11’s four astronauts are now on their way the International Space Station, with an expected arrival time at the orbital outpost around 3AM ET tomorrow, August 2.
The countdown today was a near carbon copy of yesterday’s: picture perfect with few if any issues until the last half hour. At that time, with afternoon temperatures rising into what is best called “miserable”, coastal winds started to rise up in the atmosphere, creating clouds that would grow into rain showers and later, thunderstorms. Yesterday, the clouds were too close to LC-39A and caused a launch scrub because of a weather violation. Today, with a Phase 1 lightning issued only minutes before, the burgeoning showers stayed just far enough away to allow the countdown to proceed and liftoff to occur on schedule.
Later, when Booster 1094 returned to Landing Zone 1 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station rather quietly — from the vantage of the KSC Press Site, the descending booster was hidden in the clouds until the very last, appearing only a second or two before it’s final landing burn began. The normal sonic boom was muted too, and was nowhere near as loud as normal. Today’s landing marks the last at Landing Zone 1 as SpaceX prepares to move Falcon 9 landing operations to a new area nearly adjacent to Space Launch Complex 40.
Meanwhile, the second stage and astronauts aboard Crew Dragon Endeavour continued on their way to orbit, which they achieved at the T+ 00:08:46 mark. At T+ 09:36, Crew Dragon separated from Falcon 9’s second stage.
Now in orbit, Crew 11 will begin chasing down ISS in earnest, with an expected arrival time around 3 AM ET on August 2nd.
After docking, the station’s total crew will climb to 11 for a brief period as they join current occupants: NASA astronauts Anne McClain, Nichole Ayers, and Jonny Kim; JAXA astronaut Takuya Onishi; and Roscosmos cosmonauts Kirill Peskov, Sergey Ryzhikov, and Alexey Zubritsky.
Crew-10, the previous NASA-SpaceX mission, will remain aboard for a short handover after Crew-11 arrives, then return to Earth. Before their departure, mission teams will monitor weather conditions at designated splashdown zones off the California coast to ensure a safe landing.
Crew-11’s mission focuses heavily on scientific research supporting long-duration human spaceflight and applications on Earth. Their work includes simulating lunar landings, studying how to protect astronauts’ vision in space, and advancing human spaceflight research through NASA’s Human Research Program. Additional experiments will explore plant cell division, the impact of microgravity on virus-bacteria interactions, and methods to produce more human stem cells and generate nutrients on demand.
After more than five decades in orbit, a relic from the first space race is making an unexpected return. Kosmos 482, a Soviet spacecraft launched in 1972 on a failed mission to Venus, is projected to reenter Earth’s atmosphere between May 9 and May 11, 2025. Experts are closely monitoring its descent, as the probe’s durable construction raises the possibility that parts of it could survive reentry and reach the Earth’s surface.
The lander has a titanium shell and shielding that could allow it to withstand reentry through Earth’s atmosphere. That seems almost likely, given that the descent module of Kosmos 482 was made to travel through Venus’s much denser atmosphere all the way to the surface of Earth’s “evil twin.” If the lander survives intact, it could slam into the ground at speeds up to 150 mph. While chances are rated as low as being struck by lightning, there is a higher than zero chance that the spacecraft could land on Florida.
Kosmos 482 is in its final days and space and will enter the Earth’s atmosphere and crash back on our home planet sometime this week. In an interview with NPR, an astronomer at the Center for Astrophysics at Harvard and The Smithsonian, Dr. Jonathon McDowell, played down the chances of it doing so on land, saying “It’s more likely that it will splash down in a body of water than land on the ground, says Jonathan McDowell.
“There’s a not-trivial chance that it could hit somewhere where it damages property, and there’s a small chance — but it’s like one in thousands — that it could hurt someone,” he told NPR’s All Things Considered.
Dr. McDowell is spot-on: the Earth is mostly covered by water, and the chances of any particular spot on the Earth is the ultimate landing area are quite small indeed.
Dr. Marco Langbroek, a noted lecturer of Space Situational Awareness at the Faculty of Aerospace Engineering of Delft Technical University in the Netherlands stated on X.com today that “Our newest TUDAT reentry model results for the Kosmos 482 Descent Craft, the lander of a 53-year-old failed Soviet Venus probe [yields the] current forecast: 10 May 7:34 UTC +/- 14 hours.” His organization also showed the path of the probe during that time period, saying that it could re-enter anywhere along the lines in the graphic above.
While the chances are infinitesimally small that Kosmos 482 re-enters during its pass over southern Florida and the metro-Dade area during that time period, the chances are also more than zero and as such are interesting.
Kosmos 482 was launched on March 31, 1972, as part of the Soviet Union’s ambitious Venera program aimed at exploring Venus. The spacecraft was intended to deliver a lander to the Venusian surface, collecting data on the planet’s atmosphere and geology. However, a malfunction in the launch vehicle’s upper stage prevented the probe from escaping Earth’s orbit.
As a result, Kosmos 482 was stranded in a highly elliptical orbit, where it has remained ever since. Since its launch, 482 has looped around the planet for 53 years, but at the perigee (lowest point) of each of those orbits, it has encountered friction from the upper part of Earth’s atmosphere. That in turn has slowed Kosmos 482 slightly, and over time, it’s apogee (highest point) in orbit has steadily decreased. Now, the orbit is so low that re-entry is inevitable.
The spacecraft’s main bus reentered Earth’s atmosphere and disintegrated shortly after launch, but the lander module—designed to withstand the extreme conditions of Venus’s atmosphere—remained intact and continued orbiting Earth. Weighing approximately 495 kilograms (1,091 pounds), the lander is built with a robust titanium shell and heat-resistant materials, making it particularly resilient to the intense heat and pressure of atmospheric reentry — exactly what it was designed to do.
Predicting the exact time and location of Kosmos 482’s reentry is challenging due to various factors, including atmospheric conditions and solar activity. The potential impact zone spans a wide area between 52 degrees north and 52 degrees south latitude, encompassing regions from Canada to South America, Europe, Asia, Africa, and Australia. Kosmos 482 will fall somewhere, but again, it is almost certainly going to be into one of Earth’s oceans and not on anyone’s home or head.
Dr. McDowell noted that while the risk of injury or property damage is minimal, it is not zero. He compared the odds of being hit by debris from Kosmos 482 to those of being struck by lightning.
The lander’s design, intended to survive the harsh environment of Venus, means it could endure reentry through Earth’s atmosphere. If it does, the module could impact the surface at speeds up to 150 miles per hour (242 kilometers per hour). However, some experts suggest that the heat shield may have degraded over time, increasing the chances of the spacecraft burning up during reentry.
There have been reports of a parachute-like structure trailing the lander, possibly deployed during the initial mission. While intriguing, experts believe that even if the parachute is intact, it is unlikely to function effectively after decades in space, given that it will depend on long-depleted battery systems to function.
While the chances of this old spacecraft landing on any given spot in Florida is about the same as winning the lottery, it is worth keeping an eye on Kosmos 482 if for no other reason than it is the end of an interesting historical relic.
You must be logged in to post a comment.