SpaceX

NASA has released a sweeping investigation report into the propulsion system failures that plagued Boeing’s CST-100 Starliner during its Crewed Flight Test (CFT) last year. The report finds a cascade of hardware failures, qualification gaps, organizational breakdowns, and a culture that prioritized schedule and provider success over engineering rigor in the program.

Read more

Crew 12 departing Space Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station this morning.
Photo: Charles Boyer

SpaceX launched Falcon 9 early this morning, sending four astronauts on NASA’s Crew-12 mission to the International Space Station. Liftoff from Space Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station occurred at 5:15 AM ET, with NASA astronauts Jessica Meir and Jack Hathaway, European Space Agency astronaut Sophie Adenot, and Roscosmos cosmonaut Andrey Fedyaev aboard Crew Dragon capsule ‘Freedom.’

Read more

File photo of Crew 11's ascent. Photo: Charles Boyer
File photo of Crew 11’s ascent. Photo: Charles Boyer

A Wednesday launch attempt for NASA’s Crew-12 mission has been scrubbed due to unfavorable weather along the Falcon 9 and Crew Dragon spacecraft’s flight path, pushing the next opportunity to no earlier than 5:38 AM ET on Thursday, Feb. 12th.

Following a weather review Monday, mission teams opted to stand down from the February 11 window. Conditions along the trajectory remain a concern for the new target date, though forecasters expect improvement heading into a backup window on Friday, February 13th.

The four-person crew — NASA astronauts Jessica Meir and Jack Hathaway, European Space Agency astronaut Sophie Adenot, and Roscosmos cosmonaut Andrey Fedyaev — continues pre-flight quarantine at Kennedy Space Center as they await their ride to the International Space Station.

Next Launch: Falcon 9 Block 5 | Crew-12

Go for Launch • Cape Canaveral SFS, FL • SLC-40

Field Details
Mission Crew-12 (crewed Dragon mission to the ISS for NASA’s Commercial Crew Program)
Organization SpaceX
Rocket Falcon 9
Launch Site Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Florida, USA
Pad Space Launch Complex 40 (SLC-40)
Window Opens Thursday, 02/12/2026 5:38:00 AM (ET)
Window Closes Thursday, 02/12/2026 5:38:00 AM (ET)
Destination Low Earth Orbit
Status Info Current T-0 confirmed by official or reliable sources.
Mission Description SpaceX Crew-12 is the twelfth crewed operational flight of a Crew Dragon spacecraft to the International Space Station as part of NASA’s Commercial Crew Program.
Countdown (to window open)
As of: (your local time)
Launch times are subject to change due to weather, range operations, and mission requirements.

The mission will launch aboard a SpaceX Dragon capsule atop a Falcon 9 rocket from Space Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. If the Thursday window holds, the crew would dock with the station around 10:30 AM ET on Friday.

Range Conflict?

With NASA’s announcement that Crew 12 would now target Thursday, February 12, a potential range conflict comes into focus: United Launch Alliance and the US Space Force plan to launch Vulcan on a national security mission at roughly the same time on Thursday.

Next Launch: Vulcan VC4S | USSF-87

Go for Launch • Cape Canaveral SFS, FL • SLC-41

Field Details
Mission USSF-87 (two GSSAP space situational awareness satellites to near-geosynchronous orbit)
Organization United Launch Alliance
Rocket Vulcan VC4S
Launch Site Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Florida, USA
Pad Space Launch Complex 41 (SLC-41)
Window Opens Thursday, 02/12/2026 3:00:00 AM (ET)
Window Closes Thursday, 02/12/2026 7:50:00 AM (ET)
Destination Geostationary Orbit
Status Info Current T-0 confirmed by official or reliable sources.
Mission Description USSF-87 will launch two identical Geosynchronous Space Situational Awareness Program (GSSAP) satellites, GSSAP-7 and GSSAP-8, directly to a near-geosynchronous orbit approximately 36,000 km above the equator. Data from GSSAP will contribute to timely and accurate orbital predictions, improving spaceflight safety and satellite collision avoidance.
Countdown (to window open)
As of: (your local time)
Launch times are subject to change due to weather, range operations, and mission requirements.

Given NASA’s announcement, one must wonder if the date for USSF-87 will change, or if ULA and the Space Force will stand pat, expecting a second change to Crew 12.

Stay tuned.

Read more

The K150 Cyclotron at Texas A&M Photo credit: CERN

SpaceX plans to build a particle accelerator facility in Florida. The 230 MeV cyclotron will accelerate protons to near-light speed, which the company says will be used to bring radiation effects testing in-house across all of its vehicles and satellite platforms.

The facility was confirmed by Michael Nicolls, SpaceX’s Vice President of Starlink, who posted on X on February 5 that the company is “hiring elite engineers at our new 230 MeV cyclotron facility in Florida, where we are bringing single-event radiation testing in house to accelerate development across all SpaceX vehicles.”

A job posting from SpaceX on ZipRecruiter is looking for an Electronics Test Engineer, and provides additional details.

As part of our continuous effort to vertically integrate and scale safe and rapid access to space as well as improve the baseline reliability of our multiple on-orbit mega-constellations, SpaceX has acquired a 230 MeV cyclotron to bring radiation single event effects testing in house,” the posting reads. “This proton particle accelerator will be used to screen and characterize electronics across all of our vehicles and platforms, unlocking unprecedented agility for chip and PCBA level performance characterization that will be critical as we build and scale our AI constellations and deep space exploration vehicles.

The exact location of the facility within Florida has not been disclosed. The job posting mentions Winter Park, a town in the Orlando metroplex. SpaceX operates extensive facilities across the Space Coast, including launch sites at Kennedy Space Center’s Launch Complex 39A and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station’s Space Launch Complex 40 and the forthcoming SLC-37, along with the expanding Roberts Road complex where the company is constructing its Florida Gigabay manufacturing facility and Starfactory 2.0.

Radiation Dangers?

Ionizing radiation (gamma rays, X-Rays, etc.) is produced during cyclotron operation. There’s also the use of high voltages and strong magnetic fields, plus, in some cases, hazardous target gases or liquids. Facilities typically address these with thick concrete or earth shielding, restricted access zones, and rigorous safety protocols.

For the general public outside a properly shielded facility, the risk is essentially negligible. Radiation levels at the facility boundary are required to be well below regulatory limits. The fact is, the average Space Coast resident will receive a far higher annual radiation dose from Earth’s background radiation alone.

Space Coast Annual Background Radiation

Annual Background Radiation Dose — Florida’s Space Coast

Estimated dose for Brevard County residents (sea level, ~28.5°N latitude)

Radiation Source Description mSv/year
Cosmic Radiation From deep space & solar particles Minimal at sea level; deflected by Earth’s magnetic field at low latitude ~0.26
Terrestrial Radiation From soil, rock & sand Florida’s sandy coastal soils are among the lowest in the U.S. ~0.10–0.23
Radon & Thoron Radioactive gas from ground decay Very low on the Space Coast — sandy soil, no basements, good ventilation ~0.50–1.00
Internal (Body) Potassium-40, carbon-14 & other radionuclides Present in all humans regardless of location ~0.40
Food & Water Trace radionuclides ingested daily Potassium in bananas, brazil nuts, seafood, etc. ~0.30
Estimated Space Coast Natural Background Total ~1.60–2.20

Talk of Titusville

Who Regulates A Cyclotron?

If a cyclotron were installed on Florida’s Space Coast, the primary regulatory authority would be the Florida Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control. Florida has been an “Agreement State” since 1964, when the Atomic Energy Commission (now the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission) signed a formal agreement transferring authority over radioactive materials licensing and enforcement to the state.

Today the Bureau of Radiation Control licenses more than 1,800 users of radioactive materials across Florida, including hospitals, universities, and research institutions.

A cyclotron operator would need to obtain a specific radioactive materials license from this bureau before possessing or using any of the isotopes a cyclotron produces. The bureau also handles registration of the cyclotron itself as an ionizing radiation machine under Chapter 64E-5 of the Florida Administrative Code.

The NRC retains an oversight role, periodically auditing Florida’s program to ensure it meets federal safety standards, but the state bureau is the agency an operator would deal with directly for licensing, inspections, and enforcement.

Why Build This Now?

Until now, aerospace companies including SpaceX have relied on a small number of external facilities to perform this testing. The Texas A&M Cyclotron Institute’s Radiation Effects Facility and the 88-Inch Cyclotron at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory have been the primary U.S. facilities, serving clients including SpaceX, Blue Origin, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and NASA — all competing for limited beam time.

Texas A&M’s facility tested nearly 100 electronic components for SpaceX’s Crew Dragon capsule during a three-year period leading up to the historic Demo-2 mission in May 2020, which launched astronauts Bob Behnken and Doug Hurley to the International Space Station from KSC’s Pad 39A.

By building its own cyclotron, SpaceX eliminates the bottleneck of competing for beam time at shared facilities and gains the ability to test on its own schedule — a significant advantage given the pace at which the company iterates on hardware. SpaceX is currently producing new generations of Starlink satellites at a rapid clip, developing Starshield military variants, building the Starship Human Landing System for NASA’s Artemis program, and continuing to fly Dragon crew and cargo missions.

The natural radiation environment of space necessitates radiation testing for verification and improvements of the company’s product lines and is consistent with SpaceX’s broader strategy of aggressive vertical integration: if you can do it faster and cheaper internally, build it yourself.

Read more

Ax-3 On The Launch Pad Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville

Axiom Space has secured another trip to the International Space Station after NASA selected the Houston-based company for a fifth commercial crew mission to the orbital outpost.

Axiom Mission 5 could launch as early as January 2027 from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida, with a four-person crew spending approximately two weeks conducting research and technology demonstrations aboard the station. The actual launch date will depend on spacecraft scheduling and ISS operational needs.

NASA chose Axiom through a competitive process outlined in the agency’s March 2025 Research Announcement. The selection continues a pattern of relying on private missions to maximize utilization of the aging laboratory before its eventual retirement.

NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman framed the announcement as proof that commercial human spaceflight has matured from proof-of-concept flights into routine operations—capabilities the agency views as essential groundwork for lunar and Martian expeditions.

The ISS Program Office sees these commercial visits as opportunities to cultivate new markets and validate technologies while preserving the station’s scientific and diplomatic functions. As NASA works toward handing off low Earth orbit operations to private providers, missions like Ax-5 serve as both revenue generators and testbeds for the post-ISS era.

As before, the mission will fly aboard a SpaceX Crew Dragon, launched by a Falcon 9.

Axiom Crews

Mission Launch Date Crew
Axiom-1 April 8, 2022 Michael López-Alegría (Cmdr) — USA/Spain Larry Connor (Pilot) — USA Eytan Stibbe (MS) — Israel Mark Pathy (MS) — Canada
Axiom-2 May 21, 2023 Peggy Whitson (Cmdr) — USA John Shoffner (Pilot) — USA Ali Alqarni (MS) — Saudi Arabia Rayyanah Barnawi (MS) — Saudi Arabia
Axiom-3 January 18, 2024 Michael López-Alegría (Cmdr) — USA/Spain Walter Villadei (Pilot) — Italy Alper Gezeravcı (MS) — Turkey Marcus Wandt (MS) — Sweden
Axiom-4 June 25, 2025 Peggy Whitson (Cmdr) — USA Shubhanshu Shukla (Pilot) — India Sławosz Uznański-Wiśniewski (MS) — Poland Tibor Kapu (MS) — Hungary
Axiom-5 NET January 2027 Crew TBD

Axiom will nominate its crew roster for Axiom 5 to NASA for its approval and international partner agencies. Selected astronauts will then complete training alongside NASA personnel and the spacecraft operator before flight.

Read more

SpaceX Booster B1067 prior to its 22nd flight
SpaceX Booster B1067 prior to its 22nd flight
SpaceX Falcon 9 in September 2024. Photo: Charles Boyer

Yesterday after the launch of Starlink 17-32 from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California, SpaceX deployed its payload of Starlink satellites as planned, but was apparently unable to complete a deorbit burn of the second stage used for the mission. That burn allows the company to precisely place the re-entry zone for safe disposal of the second stage. That in turn has led SpaceX to pause Falcon 9 flights while it investigates the issue.

For its part, SpaceX said on X last night that “During today’s Falcon 9 launch of Starlink satellites, the second stage experienced an off-nominal condition during preparation for the deorbit burn. The vehicle then performed as designed to successfully passivate the stage. The first two MVac burns were nominal and safely deployed all 25 Starlink satellites to their intended orbit. Teams are reviewing data to determine root cause and corrective actions before returning to flight.”

UPDATE: Talk of Titusville asked the FAA whether an investigation would be required and whether it would pause Falcon 9 licenses until the investigation was completed, and after the latest government shutdown was resolved, they replied on February 5th, “Safety is our top priority. SpaceX is required to conduct a mishap investigation. The FAA will oversee every step of the investigation, approve the final report and any corrective actions.”

Falcon 9 Upper Stage Incidents

Mission Incident Date Return to Flight
Starlink Group 9-3 July 2024 15 days later
Crew-9 September 2024 ~2 weeks later
Starlink 10-12 February 2025 Undetermined

As of: February 3, 2026 at 8:32 AM EST

Spaceflight expert Dr. Jonathan McDowell noted yesterday that the second stage for Starlink 17-32 won’t be in orbit long. He posted on the X platform late last night, saying “[The US] Space Force has cataloged the errant Starlink 17-32 Falcon 9 upper stage as object 67673 [and it is] in a 110 x 241 km x 97.3 deg orbit. It will reenter quickly.”

The payload deployed normally, so there is no danger of uncommanded reentry of the 25 Starlink satellites. According to Dr. McDowell, “The Starlinks report themselves in the target 246 x 260 km orbit. The second stage did not make a deorbit burn, but it did passivate by venting prop, and this lowered the perigee to 110 km.”

Effect On Eastern Range Launches?

With launches delayed for the time being, it is fair to say that the first three of the four Falcon 9 launches SpaceX has planned for Cape Canaveral may not be launched on their planned launch dates:

SpaceX Falcon 9 Launches – February 2026

Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Florida

Date Mission Window Pad Notes
Feb 5 Starlink 6-103 4:46 PM EST SLC-40 29 Starlink sats; B1095 (5th); ASOG
NET Feb 6 Starlink 6-104 TBD SLC-40 29 Starlink sats; B1077 (26th); JRTI
NET Feb 11 Crew-12 6:00 AM EST SLC-40 Crew Dragon to ISS; RTLS landing
Late Feb Starlink (TBD) TBD SLC-40 Additional missions expected

Legend: NET = No Earlier Than • ASOG/JRTI = Drone ships • RTLS = Return to Launch Site

Note: Schedule subject to change. Additional Starlink flights typically added throughout the month.

As of: February 3, 2026 at 8:32 AM EST

That includes Crew 12, which was planned for NET February 11. Before yesterday’s Artemis II Wet Dress Rehearsal and subsequent schedule shift to NET March 6 for NASA’s moon mission, the February 11 date was in question due to Artemis II, now that date is in peril while SpaceX investigates its latest anomaly.

This story is evolving. Stay tuned.

Read more