LC-39A

Artist’s rendering of Starship on its launch mount at LC-39A at Kennedy Space Center

The 50,000 foot view

The Federal Aviation Administration released the Final Environmental Impact Statement and its Record of Decision regarding the matter this morning. The Record of Decision approves SpaceX to operate Starship-Super Heavy at Launch Complex 39A at Kennedy Space Center, clearing the final major regulatory hurdle for the company’s next-generation launch vehicle on Florida’s Space Coast.

Now, SpaceX needs to complete the build out its infrastructure at LC-39A, relocate Starship flight hardware from Boca Chica, Texas to KSC, and obtain the necessary FAA launch license(s) to launch the 408.1 feet (124.4 meter) tall rocket. It will be the most powerful rocket to ever launch from the Eastern Range, eclipsing the venerable Saturn V, New Glenn and even SLS Block I.

The decision authorizes up to 44 Starship-Super Heavy launches and 88 landings annually—44 each for the Super Heavy booster and Starship upper stage. Ocean landings on droneships in the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans are also permitted.

The approval follows a 16-month environmental review process that began with a Notice of Intent published in May 2024, included multiple public comment periods, and culminated in the Final Environmental Impact Statement released today.

FAA Record of Decision: SpaceX Starship at LC-39A Kennedy Space Center • Signed Jan 29, 2026
Category Details
🚀 Approved Operations
Annual Limits Approved
44 launches • 88 landings (44 Super Heavy + 44 Starship) • 88 static fires
  • Super Heavy: LC-39A catch or Atlantic Ocean droneship/expendable
  • Starship: LC-39A, Atlantic/Pacific/Indian Ocean droneship or water landing
Infrastructure Approved
~800,000 sq ft improvements: launch mount, catch tower, propellant generation (methane liquefier, air separation unit), storage tanks, deluge ponds, water system (~518,000 L/launch)
⚠️ Significant Environmental Effects
Emissions Significant
NOx: 385.66 tons/yr (54% over threshold, 4.35% of Brevard County)
GHG: 217,354 MT CO2e/yr (319% over threshold, 2.81% of county)
Noise Significant
Sonic booms exceed 60 dB CDNL on 28,595 acres off-KSC • Up to 82% awakening probability at night • Outdoor levels exceed 97 dB max at locations outside KSC/CCSFS
Air Traffic Significant
Avg delay: ~40 min (up to 2 hrs) • Ground stops at Core 30 FL airports • Coordination with Canada, Bahamas, Mexico, Central America, Cuba
🚧 Access Restrictions
Closures Tests: ~396 hrs/yr (4.5%) • Launches/reentries: ~462 hrs/yr (5.3%) • Total: ~10% of year (half day/half night)
NPS revenue impact: $239K–$423K/yr (13–24% loss to Canaveral National Seashore)
🐢 Wildlife Conditions (USFWS)
Training & Surveys Required
All personnel: wildlife training before onsite work (species ID, sea turtle/scrub-jay/indigo snake/manatee protocols) • Pre-construction biological surveys required • Lighting Operations Manual for sea turtle season
Manatee Required
Dedicated observer on vessels in Indian River Lagoon • 50 ft minimum distance • ≤10 knots where observed • No wake/idle near docks
📊 Required Monitoring
Species Monitoring
Scrub-jay: 70% banded in 1 yr, 90% in 3 yrs; census pre/post breeding
Sea turtle: Mar 1–Oct 31; 8 light surveys/yr; all hawksbill/Kemp’s ridley/leatherback nests monitored
Beach mouse: Habitat use, survival, reproduction, population density
Physical Monitoring
Noise: 3 events each for SH/Starship static fires, launches, landings (15 total)
Vibration: Loggers at 0.3 mi, 15″ deep; min 3 launches
🐋 Marine Conditions (NMFS)
Distance & Vessel Required
Activities ≥5 nm from coast (≥1 nm within 50 mi of LC-39A) • No coral reef landings • Dedicated observer on recovery ops • 300 ft from mammals, 150 ft from turtles • ≤10 kts near mother/calf
Right Whale Required
1,500 ft minimum distance • Nov–Apr: SH and Starship cannot both land in critical habitat same flight • No landings in active Slow/Dynamic Mgmt Areas • Flight reports within 30 days until full reusability
🏛️ Historic Preservation (NHPA)
Structures Monitoring
9 structures monitored through first 5 launches + 5 SH landings + 1 Starship landing: St. Gabriel’s Church, Pritchard House, Walker Apts (Titusville); Cocoa Jr High, Aladdin Theater (Cocoa); Cape Canaveral Lighthouse (CCSFS); John Sams House, St. Luke’s Church (Merritt Island); Beach House (KSC)
Programmatic Agreement executed Nov 22, 2025 with FL SHPO & Seminole Tribe
📋 Public Notice & Coordination
Notifications Launch schedules via news outlets, KSC SIMS, NASASpaceflight.com, Florida Today app, Brevard County Emergency Mgmt
Claims Property damage: insurance@spacex.com (SpaceX carries insurance per Commercial Space Launch Act)
Annual Meetings Required
USFWS: Jan 1–31 annually (NASA, SpaceX, FAA, USFWS, NPS, USSF) • NHPA: November annually
Record of Decision: SpaceX Starship-Super Heavy at LC-39A, KSC | Signed: Jan 29, 2026 by Katie L. Cranor, FAA | FAA Project Page

Milestones To Launching Starship From Kennedy Space Center

Updated today:

SpaceX Starship Approval Milestones: LC-39A Kennedy Space Center • FAA Environmental Impact Statement & Launch License Process
Status Milestone Date Details
Complete Notice of Intent PublishedFAA May 10, 2024 FAA initiated the EIS process via Federal Register publication
Complete Public Scoping PeriodFAA May–Jun 2024 Public input gathered on scope of environmental review; ended June 24, 2024
Complete Draft EIS ReleasedFAA Aug 4, 2025 Draft EIS published for up to 44 launches and 44 landings per year
Complete Draft EIS Comment PeriodFAA Aug 4–Sep 29, 2025 Hearings at KSC (Aug 26), Cape Canaveral (Aug 28), virtual (Sept 3); view comments
Complete Final EIS PublicationFAA Jan 30, 2026 Final EIS published addressing all public comments
Complete Record of Decision (ROD)FAA Jan 30, 2026 ROD issued with decision, mitigations, and monitoring requirements
Ongoing Infrastructure CompletionSpaceX Mid-2026 (proj.) Launch mount (installed Nov 2025), tank farm, deluge system, chopstick upgrades
Pending Vehicle Operator LicenseFAA Expected 2026 New or modified launch license for Starship-Super Heavy at LC-39A; FAA project page
Upcoming First Starship LaunchSpaceX 2026 (targeted) Initial vehicles transported from Starbase, Texas via barge
Lead Agency: FAA | Cooperating: NASA, Dept. of Air Force, Coast Guard, Fish & Wildlife, National Park Service | Updated: Jan 30, 2026

FAA Documents

The original documents are at the FAA’s Project Website, located here

Executive Summary

Record of Decision

For those who are interested in reading the minutiae of the Decision, here is a list of links to all available documents:

Read more

Starship Heavy lifts off from Boca Chica, Texas to start the IFT-6 mission. Photo: Richard Gallagher, FMN
Starship tower under construction in 2022 Photo: Charles Boyer / ToT
Starship tower under construction in 2022
Photo: Charles Boyer

Things are hopping over at Kennedy Space Center. The Artemis II crew is preparing for humanity’s first crewed mission around the Moon in over 50 years, and Crew-12 awaits its turn to rotate astronauts aboard the International Space Station. That’s keeping NASA and its contracting partners working hard and tightly focused on the missions.

At the same time, the Federal Aviation Administration is on the verge of completing its environmental review of SpaceX’s plan to launch Starship from Launch Complex 39A.

The FAA’s first estimated completion date for the Final Environmental Impact Statement is January 30, 2026 — today — according to the federal permitting dashboard. While it may not be released today, it does indicate that the document and the Record of Decision will be released soon.

What’s At Stake

SpaceX could receive regulatory clearance to operate the world’s most powerful rocket from the same complex where Apollo 11 and dozens of Space Shuttle missions got their starts.

None of those historic missions ever concluded at LC-39A, however, and that’s part of what SpaceX is planning to do fairly regularly at KSC: launching Starship Heavy and landing Starship missions there after their job in space has been completed. Their proposal kicked off the process whose middle act could conclude any day now.

Where We Are In The Process

SpaceX Starship LC-39A Approval Milestones
SpaceX Starship Approval Milestones: LC-39A at Kennedy Space Center FAA Environmental Impact Statement & Launch License Process
Milestone Date Status Details
Notice of Intent Published
FAA
May 10, 2024 Complete FAA initiated the EIS process via Federal Register publication
Public Scoping Period
FAA
May–June 2024 Complete Public input gathered on scope of environmental review; ended June 24, 2024
Draft EIS Released
FAA
August 4, 2025 Complete Draft EIS published for up to 44 Starship launches and 44 landings per year
Draft EIS Public Comment Period
FAA
Aug 4–Sept 29, 2025 Complete Public hearings held at KSC (Aug 26), Cape Canaveral (Aug 28), and virtually (Sept 3)
Final EIS Publication
FAA
Q1 2026 (expected) Pending FAA will address all public comments and issue the Final EIS
Record of Decision (ROD)
FAA
~Jan 30, 2026 (est.) Pending FAA issues ROD with decision, mitigations, and monitoring requirements
Per permits.performance.gov estimated completion date
Vehicle Operator License Issuance
FAA
After ROD Upcoming New or modified commercial launch license for Starship-Super Heavy operations at LC-39A
Infrastructure Completion
SpaceX
Mid-2026 (projected) Upcoming Launch mount (installed Nov 2025), tank farm, deluge system, chopstick upgrades, service structure outfitting
First Starship Launch from LC-39A
SpaceX
2026 (targeted) Upcoming Initial vehicles will be transported from Starbase, Texas via barge
Lead Agency: FAA  |  Cooperating Agencies: NASA, Dept. of the Air Force, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, National Park Service
Source: FAA Stakeholder Engagement Portal, Federal Register, permits.performance.gov  |  Updated: January 2026

The FAA Isn’t NASA Though…

At Kennedy Space Center, NASA and the FAA have distinct roles. NASA manages the spaceport and leases LC-39A to SpaceX. On the other hand, the FAA has authority over commercial launch licensing, and, as the responsible agency, it must complete an independent environmental review before SpaceX can launch or land Starship from the site.

“While the 2019 Environmental Assessment prepared by NASA provides an analytical baseline, the environmental impacts of these proposed changes to Starship-Super Heavy LC-39A development and operations will be specifically analyzed in this EIS,” the FAA noted in its project documentation.

The scope has changed dramatically since that 2019 assessment. SpaceX now proposes up to 44 Starship launches per year — nearly double the original 24 — along with booster catches at the pad using the company’s signature “chopstick” tower arms, a capability that didn’t exist when NASA issued its original Finding of No Significant Impact.

The FAA released its Draft EIS on August 4, 2025, triggering a public comment period that closed on September 29. The agency held public hearings at Kennedy Space Center, Cape Canaveral, and online, collecting feedback that must be addressed in the Final EIS before a Record of Decision can be issued.

Now the Final Environmental Impact Statement is on deck, and that could come out any day.

Meanwhile, Back At The Rocket Ranch…

SpaceX hasn’t sat on its hands waiting for regulatory approval. The company has transformed LC-39A over the past year, pivoting from a Starship tower not being worked on to an active construction site steadily advancing toward operational status.

The most visible progress came in November 2025, when SpaceX transported a new orbital launch mount from its Roberts Road manufacturing facility to the pad. The original mount design was scrapped earlier in 2025 in favor of hardware matching the company’s latest configuration at Starbase in Texas.

Other work continues as well — construction of a tank farm to store propellants, outfitting the service structure and more. Clearly, SpaceX expects good news in the EIS and ROD, and given that Starship is an integral part of Project Artemis, it’s fair to say that those two legal hurdles are effectively fait accompli, and that when they are released, they will be positive for this ongoing project.

Read more

SpaceX’s Starship Tower under construction at LC-39A at Kennedy Space Center
Photo: Charles Boyer / ToT

The FAA is holding the first two of its give public meetings for Starship at LC-39A at Kennedy Space Center this afternoon and this evening at the KSC Visitors Center. You will not need to pay admission or parking to attend.

Information provided by the FAA:

IMPORTANT: Print this parking pass for KSCVC. You may download it here or below. It is on Page 3 of the document.

The Draft EIS is here: The Draft Environmental Impact Statement 

Zoom link for online meetings: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_2aotlSQERXCHC5yJjOvm5A

Zoom can be downloaded at https://www.zoom.com/

These five public meetings are the last chance the public can participate in the EIS process in person.

See Also

Talk of Titusville has covered Starship at LC-39A for quite some time. Here is a list of some of the best articles:

Read more

A Guide For Space Coast Visitors

Watching a rocket tear skyward from Launch Complex 39A at Kennedy Space Center is a visceral thrill—one that most people will remember for the rest of their lives. If you are a photographer, the memories are amplified when you freeze the moment in sharp, vibrant photographs. Even though a still photograph won’t come with the incredible sounds of the engines of a Falcon 9 or Falcon Heavy as it breaks free of the bonds of gravity, a good photo will last a lifetime and keep the memories of your time here in Florida.

Kennedy Space Center offers several iconic viewing spots, each with its own character and challenges. Let’s take a look:

Location, Location, Location

A lot of the professional rocket photos you see in news articles or sites like this are taken from “privileged” positions — the Press Site, for example, or by cameras placed near the launch pad in advance that are triggered by devices like a MIOPS+, which activated the camera’s shutter when it “hears” the roar of the sounds from liftoff. Unless you are working press, you won’t be able to access those spots.

There are only a few places that are accessible to the general public that offer similar proximity, but indeed, there are three:

Apollo-Saturn Center / Banana Creek Viewing Site

One of the most convenient locations is the Apollo/Saturn V Center, which lies just over a mile south of LC-39A. From the raised terraces and the old observation gantry, you enjoy clean sightlines to the pad without a cluttered foreground. You will usually need to purchase a ticket to the ASC in addition to parking and entrance to the Kennedy Space Center Visitors Center, and that can add up.

KSCVC Admission Prices (General Admission)
  • Adults (12+): Typically around $75 online
  • Children (3–11): Generally about $65

Note: Prices can vary slightly depending on date and promotions

KSCVC Parking Fees

According to official Kennedy Space Center parking info:

  • Automobiles (cars, SUVs, light trucks, minivans): $15 per day
  • Motorcycles: $5 per day
  • Oversized vehicles (RVs, motorhomes): $20 per day

Those are 2025 prices, and may change at any time, but this will give you an idea of how much it costs to gain entry. That’s just half of it: you usually need to purchase a Launch Viewing Ticket, and they can range from free (often with a Starlink launch), or as high as $250, which was the cost for Artemis I, Crew 7 and other high-profile flights.

Read the fine print of the ticket carefully too. A launch viewing ducat is good for that launch attempt, and if the mission scrubs, your ticket may be considered “used.” During Artemis I’s lengthy launch campaign with a number of scrubs, a lot of people found this out the hard way. Know before you go and decide if that’s for you, or not.

Check out: Kennedy Space Center Visitors Center: See A Launch

You will be about 3.5 miles from LC-39A and you will be as close as anyone. It’s a great experience and one I highly recommend, but it can be pricey for a family to undertake. I advise folks to get a 2-Day ticket and to fully explore KSCVC, it has a lot of displays that are well worth your time.

What You Get:

A point-blank view.

Here’s a photo taken from the Banana Creek Viewing Site:

The EXIF information for the photograph above is shown to the left. I actually use different settings now, but this will get you started. Read on for a fuller explanation of camera settings.

Playalinda Beach, Cape Canaveral National Seashore

Playalinda is located adjacent to the launch pads at Kennedy Space Center, and it is an extremely popular place to go watch a launch. You’ll need to go there hours in advance to ensure you can gain entry — the National Park Service will stop people from entering if the parking lots are full or if it is 45 minutes or less until scheduled liftoff. Get there at least two hours early, and frankly, 3-4 hours is even better.

What You Get:

The closest you’re going to get outside of Banana Creek Viewing Site. The foreground of the beach and the crowd make for an excellent photograph, especially if you employ telephoto compression to your advantage. Consider the photo below. It looks like the crowd is almost next to the launch pad but in reality they are some 3.5 miles away. A Falcon 9 is some 22 stories tall, so it’s bigger than you might think.

Settings are similar to Banana Creek: shoot for an EV13 shot and bracket, or meter using -1 or -2 stops. Use a fast shutter speed, as mentioned below.

Biolab Road

Biolab Road is a dirt road that runs along the very aptly named Mosquito Lagoon in Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge. For day launches, this can be a great place for your photographs, especially when Playalinda is full. You won’t be all that much further away from the launch pad than you will be at Playalinda, and the water in the lagoon can make a great foreground for your photos.

What You Get:

Here is the view of LC-39A from Biolab Road, taken with a wide angle lens. You can go further down the road for closer views.

One thing to note is that Biolab Road is open from dawn to dusk, and KSC Police and/or the National Park Service will request that you leave if you’re present after hours. Those agencies can and will give you a pretty expensive ticket if you fail to comply, so the best idea is don’t do it. It’s also a bad idea for a visitor to the area to be on Biolab at night, because there are all kinds of critters there that will take a bite out of you: mosquitoes, no-see-ums, alligators and so forth, with the latter being a clear and present danger there.

Daylight hours are generally safe, but when the sun gets low and the temperatures are warm, gators will be hunting for their next meal. Don’t be that meal, so be wildlife aware.

There is also an entry fee for Biolab Road, but it there is no gate. As soon as you turn onto it, you may notice a payment box. If you have a National Parks Pass, you’re good to go. If not, pay the fee. I think it’s $15.

Bring insect repellent, drinks and everything you need. This is part of the “wildlife” areas in Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, so don’t expect a cantina with cool beers while you wait for liftoff.

Cameras and Settings

Photographing a launch is part science, part art. By picking the right vantage points—from the Apollo/Saturn V Center’s terraces to Playalinda Beach or Biolab Road — you set the stage for your composition. Then, by mastering exposure through underexposure and thoughtful bracketing, you ensure every photograph captures not only the power of the engines but the intricate beauty of the flame plume itself. Plan diligently, practice your workflow, and you’ll be ready to chase that plume into the heavens.

Your camera choice should be a DSLR or mirrorless body with a fast autofocus system. A telephoto zoom in the 70–200 mm or 100–400 mm range lets you isolate the rocket, while a wider 24–70 mm lens captures more of the landscape and sky. If you have a super-telephoto (500+ mm) consider using that. Wind and crowds make a firm tripod—or at least a monopod—essential for slower shutter speeds and a remote shutter release will guard against any camera shake. Make sure your memory cards can handle burst shooting, and bring an extra battery, since Florida’s heat and breeze can sap power faster than you expect.

Underexpose

Perhaps the single most critical exposure tactic is to underexpose by one or two stops. A rocket’s flame plume can exceed 2,000 °C, and that means it’s going to be BRIGHT. If you meter for midtones—like the launch pad structure or the sky—the highlights in the flame will blow out into featureless white. By dialing in –1 EV or even –2 EV of exposure compensation, you preserve texture in the brightest areas, revealing the billows and shock diamonds that make these plumes so visually striking. Always glance at your histogram: you want the right shoulder to approach, but not touch, the edge. For underexposed areas, you can fix that in post-processing, save for night launches. They are an entirely different animal.

And Bracket

Because plume brightness and lighting conditions vary by rocket type—whether it’s a Falcon 9, an Atlas V, New Glenn or the massive Space Launch System—you’ll also want to bracket your shots. Many cameras offer Auto Exposure Bracketing, which can capture three frames at different exposure offsets (for example, –2 EV, 0 EV, +2 EV). Later, in Lightroom or your preferred editor, you can quickly choose the frame that best balances the rocket, the plume, and the background.

This launch will only happen once, and if you’ve traveled far to get here, it may be your only chance. So, increase your odds of success by bracketing. Consult your camera’s manual if you aren’t sure how to do that. (You can also ask ChatGPT, it will give you a step-by-step list.)

Hurry Up And Wait

In the field, arrive early to claim your spot and let your gear settle. Switch your camera to manual mode: set a mid-range aperture around f/8 or f/11, a shutter speed no slower than 1/500 s to freeze motion, and an ISO in the 100–400 range. Pre-focus on the pad, then flip to manual focus to lock it in. I use gaffer’s tape (NOT duct tape) to “lock” my focus ring down in case I accidentally bump it.

Compose with the pad offset—following the rule of thirds—leaving space above for the rocket’s ascent. Include nearby structures, railings, or even beachgoers at dawn to give scale and context. At ignition, let the rocket rise slightly, then snap as fast as your camera’s image buffer will allow. You will have 3-5 seconds before the rocket clears the pad, and another 3 seconds or so while the pad itself is visible in the photo. Those latter shots are great because of the billowing steam from the sound suppression systems, and they can really add to a shot.

Why Do I Use A Higher Shutter Speed, Even If I Have To Increase ISO?

I’ve mentioned a couple of times that I now prefer a higher shutter speed when I photograph a launch. Here’s why: most of my “bad” shots I took years ago were due to camera shake or movement during the launch. I used tripods to compensate for a while, but then I had an epiphany: just use a shutter speed of at least twice my focal length and that problem will disappear. It’s not important that I may need to raise my ISO from 100 to, say, 800, because noise reduction will automagically cure that problem.

Why Do I Prefocus And Tape?

You’re going to shoot at Infinity or very close to it, no matter what lens you are using. That end of the focusing scale can be very sensitive, even with a higher aperture, and it is very easy to bump the focus ring while you are shooting and thus have less than optimal photos.

To prevent that, I’ll focus on the rocket, take an inch or two of gaffer’s tape — the non-residue kind — and lock down the focus. Easy enough.

I don’t use autofocus because the dynamic range can “confuse” an autofocus system, especially when the rocket is high in the sky and thus is smaller in the viewfinder. That’s not when I want the camera to be hunting for focus, so I’ll use manual focus instead.

Read more

Watching a rocket tear skyward from Launch Complex 39A at Kennedy Space Center is a visceral thrill—one that most people will remember for the rest of their lives. If you are a photographer, the memories are amplified when you freeze the moment in sharp, vibrant photographs. Even though a still photograph won’t come with the incredible sounds of the engines of a Falcon 9 or Falcon Heavy as it breaks free of the bonds of gravity, a good photo will last a lifetime and keep the memories of your time here in Florida.

Read more

SpaceX Starship lifting off on the IFT-2 test from Boca Chica Texas. Photo: Richard P. Gallagher, Florida Media Now
Starship Flight 8 liftoff March 6 2025
Starship Flight 8 liftoff March 6 2025. Photo: Richard Gallagher / FMN

What They Learn In Texas Will Inform Starship Sound Modeling For the Space Coast

As SpaceX’s Starship prepares for an ambitious launch schedule here at on the Space Coast at Kennedy Space Center, residents’ concerns about its acoustic impact on surrounding communities and environments have come to the forefront.

Dr. Kent Gee
Photo: BYU

Dr. Kent Gee, a physics professor and Department Chair of the Physics and Astronomy department at Brigham Young University (BYU) leads a team dedicated to understanding the noise generated by this powerful rocket. He and his team of researchers have conducted sound studies for Starship in Texas and the SLS at Kennedy Space Center, yielding some interesting results.

SpaceX has stated that they plan to launch Starship from KSC this year, and indeed, construction of the launch mount for the world’s most powerful rocket continues apace at LC-39A. While a Starship launch from the Space Coast in 2025 may be an ambitious plan, it is safe to say that within the next year the area will see, hear and feel this rocket as it climbs off the launch pad and makes its way to orbit from Florida.

Artemis Testing

“I took the students to church and we were talking to people at Merritt Island,” Dr. Gee related to Talk of Titusville. “They said, oh, you’re from BYU, what are you doing here?”

“Everyone, every single person we talked to said they wanted to tell us that some Falcon 9 launches like rattled their windows and other ones you didn’t hear at all.”

Such stories are common on the Space Coast. Some days, one may barely hear a Falcon 9 in some areas of the region, while others in other places watching the same launch from a different place might report their windows rattling or their dog barking because of the thunder-like sound of the ascending rocket.

Measuring the acoustic impact of rockets like Starship is complex due to factors like atmospheric conditions and the rocket’s trajectory. Dr. Gee’s team utilizes various sound metrics, including A-weighted and Z-weighted Decibels, to capture a comprehensive picture of the noise levels. Their findings suggest that current environmental assessments may underestimate the true acoustic impact of such launches.

Dr. Gee told us “there’s a paper that we published on the Artemis I launch. We went due west [from the launch site.] I had people sitting there [about 30 km] due west.”

“I was on the other side of the Indian River south of Titusville, about 30 kilometers, basically southwest of [the launch pad.] We were about the same distance [as the team that was due west.] I got about 100 decibels where I was.”

The team located due west? Dr. Gee explained, “They didn’t even hear the noise at 30 kilometers.”

That may seem odd, but again, sound propagation is affected by a number of factors: local weather, winds, ambient humidity and of course the direction the rocket is flying.

Dr. Gee explained that the sound he experienced from Artemis was like many other launches with “Low frequencies. It was not quiet, but because it was such low frequencies, it wasn’t like overwhelmingly loud, but it was it was about what I expected, having been to prior launches and guessing.”

Artemis I sound measurements
(a) Google Earth image annotated to show the measurement stations analyzed in this letter and their distances from LC-39B, as well as other locations of interest: SLS (not to scale) at LC-39B, the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB), Saturn-V viewing area, and the Crawlerway between the VAB and LC-39B. Shown also are the maximum 1-s OASPLs at each station after liftoff. (b) A four-microphone array at Station 7, in the middle of the Crawlerway. (c) A closeup of a weather-robust microphone ground plate setup at Station 3, with SLS in the background. From: “Space Launch System acoustics: Far-field noise measurements of the Artemis-I launch” Gee, Kent & Hart, Grant & Cunningham, Carson & Anderson, Mark & Bassett, Michael & Mathews, Logan & Durrant, J. & Moats, Levi & Coyle, Whitney & Kellison, Makayle & Kuffskie, Margaret. (2023). Space Launch System acoustics: Far-field noise measurements of the Artemis-I launch. JASA Express Letters. 3. 023601. 10.1121/10.0016878.

Dr. Gee added that “At [some places] 50 km [from the launch site,] it was like 80 Decibels and so it was like it hit like right across the Indian River. Maybe because the land mass was warmer and so you got upward refraction [of the noise] and then it bent back down.

Basic diagram of a rocket’s noise emissions.
Via: FAA

“There’s some complicated stuff going on,” he added.

That would explain the wildly varying accounts of how loud Artemis I was in different parts of the Space Coast region. Some said it was almost quiet, others reported a teeth-chattering experience. It all depended on where the observer was located and whether the local conditions were favorable to sound traveling from the ascending SLS rocket to where they were.

How Loud Will Starship Seem?

Dr. Gee’s research in Texas reveals that a single Starship launch produces noise levels equivalent to 4–6 Space Launch System (SLS) launches or at least 10 Falcon 9 launches. Measurements taken during Starship’s fifth and sixth test flights indicated that even at distances of 10 kilometers, the sound was as loud as a rock concert. At 20 kilometers, it matched the noise level of a table saw or snow blower, and at 30–35 kilometers, it was comparable to a vacuum cleaner or hair dryer. That’s pretty loud.

“It’s got this low-frequency rumble that’s just overwhelming,” Dr. Gee explained. “And then on top of it, you have this kind of high-frequency popping. I call it crackle. It’s a very unique sound experience.”

In their paper, “Starship super heavy acoustics: Far-field noise measurements during launch and the first-ever booster catch“, Dr. Gee and his team notes that the booster return resulted in a louder sound from the sonic boom that heralds the return of the booster.

The highest-amplitude event at all eight stations is the flyback sonic boom which set off car alarms at Stations 2 (10.1 km) and 4 (16.6 km). A prior Falcon 9 study (Anderson , 2024) shows near the landing pad, maximum launch noise exceeds the flyback boom, but that there is a range (∼2 km for the Falcon 9) beyond which the cylindrically spreading boom’s overpressure becomes larger in amplitude than the spherically spreading launch noise. The booster’s flyback boom’s overpressure of 7.1 psf (0.34 kPa) is part of a clean triple-shock waveform that is similar to Falcon 9’s signature (Anderson , 2024), despite the fact that Falcon 9 has a different geometry. An ongoing investigation into the aeroacoustic origins of Falcon 9’s triple boom, when complete, should also provide insights into the Super Heavy flyback boom.

Starship super heavy acoustics: Far-field noise measurements during launch and the first-ever booster catch, Dr. Kent Gee, et. al, JASA Express Lett. 4, 113601 (2024)

Sounds Like Apollo

If that’s reminiscent to old-timers in the area of the venerable Saturn V from the Apollo program, they aren’t far off. Saturn V launches were well known for their low-frequency rumbles, which gave launch spectators the feeling of the Earth shaking below their feet.

The sound power produced by SLS (202.4 dB) is still extremely loud. We compared the launch noise levels recorded at 5 km away from the rocket to the sound levels of a fresh bowl of crackling Rice Krispies® and found that SLS’s noise intensity at this distance from the rocket was approximately 40 million times greater than the crackling of cereal. If this comparison only leaves you more confused, you can think of it being about as loud as operating a chainsaw (but with the rocket over 5 km away).

Taggart Durant, “SLS vs. Saturn V: Which Was Louder?”

Effects On Wildlife?

The intense noise levels in Texas have raised concerns about potential impacts on nearby communities and wildlife there in the lower Rio Grande area and for people here on the Space Coast. Residents have reported instances of car alarms being triggered and windows rattling due to the sonic booms. Dr. Gee emphasizes the need for further studies to understand the long-term effects of repeated exposure to such noise, especially with plans for frequent launches.

An Osprey on the hunt in Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge
Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville

Starship Will Be Louder Than Falcon 9

“Titusville, Merritt Island, Cape Canaveral, those, those towns are, are gonna see greater sound levels than what you get with the Falcon 9,” Dr. Gee said.

As for the Starship Heavy noise experienced in Texas, “people are in Port Isabel — about 10 km away in Texas — they’re not reporting broken windows [after a Starship launch,]” he added. 10 km, or about 6.2 miles, is closer than any private property near LC-39A.

FAA diagram of noise from Starship launches

“I even suggested that resident surveys in the Boca Chica region would be helpful in assessing long range impacts.” Then Dr. Gee added, “I have to be careful because I don’t want to make people think that I’m calling out SpaceX saying you should XYZ. To me that’s the FAA or whoever’s job to say you ought to be looking at this because you could be gaining additional data that would be helpful in Florida.”

Those sound studies are underway, as part of the Environmental Assessment being completed by the FAA and NASA for the venerable launch complex.

Dr. Gee added, “We’re trying to put out information that we feel, feel like is helpful to provide a, to paint a realistic picture of where this rocket fits in with other rockets and what sound levels might be expected according to at least the propagation over two flights of what we measured in the field.”

The town of Cape Canaveral is embarking on sound studies, according to a recent report in Florida Today. Rick Neale reported in an article “Ahead of Starship’s arrival, Cape Canaveral to study rocket launch noise, vibrations” that:

“In a proactive move, the Cape Canaveral City Council unanimously approved an upcoming $10,019 rocket launch impact study with the Florida Institute of Technology. Researchers will install sensor suites this summer at a handful of municipal and privately owned buildings across the 1.9-square-mile city, collecting data on decibel levels, vibrations and air quality before, during and after every launch through at least May 2026.”

Dr. Gee concluded that more data is needed to fully understand the noise effects of rocket launches, “There’s longer term impacts that we just don’t quite understand yet. And I think that’s, there’s opportunities for the science to catch up.” With the City of Cape Canaveral monitoring every launch from preset locations, models that Dr. Gee and the BYU team create will only be more informative.

One thing is certain: the Eastern Range is only going to get busier as more companies conduct more launches with more powerful rockets. While Starship, SLS, and Falcon 9 get all of the attention, New Glenn and Vulcan are also in the mix, and that’s before Relativity, Vaya Space, and others join the fray.

The LC-39A EIS

The ongoing environmental assessment for Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A) at Kennedy Space Center involves SpaceX’s Starship-Super Heavy launch and landings, with an expected high level of activity at the site.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), not an Environmental Assessment (EA), due to changes in the vehicle’s design and operations since the 2019 EA, which found no significant impact.

The EIS process was initiated with a Notice of Intent published on May 10, 2024, and scoping meetings were held in June 2024 to gather public input. A release date for the Draft EA has not yet been announced.

In the document above, the FAA lays out its noise metrics that will be considered for the ongoing EIS.

Read more

Falcon 9 Maxar 4
Falcon 9 carrying Maxar 4 / WorldView 5 & 6 to orbit this evening from Kennedy Space Center
Photo: Ed Cordero, Florida Media Now

SpaceX completed a doubleheader today; not that many people saw it. At 6:13 PM, Falcon 9 lifted off out of a gloopy fog at Launch Complex 39A and lofted the Maxar 4 / WorldView 5 and WorldView 6 satellites into orbit on the second successful mission of the day for the company.

After staging, Booster B1076 begins its descent maneuvers (top) while Falcon 9’s second stage continues its ascent (bottom)
Photo: Charles Boyer / ToT

The former side core of the Falcon Heavy that launched GOES-U in June of last year, Booster B1076, completed its fourth mission by returning to the fog and scattering the wildlife before touching down at Landing Zone 1 in Cape Canaveral. Despite the fog, a sonic boom followed and spread out through the Space Coast region.

Check out the deer running away as the booster comes in to land. Look at ~5 o’clock and 8 o’clock on the screen. Video: SpaceX

Meanwhile, Falcon 9’s second stage and payload continued to orbit, which it achieved seconds after B1076 touched down. Two rounding burns later, the payload was deployed, marking yet another successful mission for SpaceX and Falcon 9.

Payload

WorldView Legion 5 and 6 are two of Maxar Technologies’ first constellation of hawk-eyed satellites providing Earth observations to the company’s clients.

Another view of post-staging from Eric Moore of Florida Media Now.

Maxar Reseller Apollo Mapping describes WorldView Legion as

WorldView Legion is a constellation of six, 34-centimeter (cm) high-resolution Earth observation satellites owned and operated by Maxar Technologies. The first two Legion satellites successfully launched on May 2, 2024 from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. On August 15, 2024, Legion 3 and Legion 4 launched from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Florida. The remaining two satellites are planned to launch in the near future.

WorldView Legion satellites offer 34-cm resolution panchromatic imagery, making them among the highest resolution commercial satellites available. They also capture multispectral imagery at 1.36-meter (m) resolution with eight bands: coastal, blue, green, yellow, red, red edge 1, red edge 2, and near-infrared (NIR). This spectral diversity enables enhanced analysis capabilities for a wide variety of applications including vegetation analysis and monitoring, mineral and hydrocarbon exploration, forestry studies, and land use-land cover classifications.

Once fully deployed, the WorldView Legion constellation will be positioned in various orbits to provide frequent revisits, with up to 15 revisits per day in some areas. Legion 1 and Legion 2 are currently in sun-synchronous orbits; and were joined by Legion 3 and Legion 4 orbiting at the Earth’s mid-latitudes (Legion 5 and Legion 6 will also be in mid-latitude orbits). At a 45-degree inclination, mid-latitude orbit, Legion 3 and Legion 4 have greater daytime coverage and more revisits in high-interest areas. With 90% of the world’s population living between 45° North and 45° South latitudes, the WorldView Legion constellation has shorter revisit times to these regions, while still covering the far northern and southern latitudes with two sun-synchronous satellites.

Main Engine Cutoff of Falcon 9
Photo: Eric Moore / Florida Media Now

Launch Replay

Next Launch

Another Falcon 9 / Starlink launch is scheduled for Friday, January 24th.

  • Date: NET February 7, 2025
  • Organization: SpaceX
  • Mission: Starlink 12-9
  • Rocket: Falcon 9
  • Launch Site: SLC-40, Cape Canaveral Space Force Station
  • Launch Window: 1:50 – 5:50 PM EST
  • Payload: Starlink satellites
  • Destination: Low-Earth Orbit
Falcon 9 Booster B1076 descending to its landing on February 4.
Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville
Read more

Early in the launch window, Playalinda Beach was bright and sunny with light breezes. Spectators were relatively light, probably because it’s Florida, it’s August and it was truly hot.
Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville

SpaceX Scrubs In The Last Minute, Disappointing Spectators

It was hotter than a dog’s mouth this morning for spectators waiting in vain to watch today’s planned rocket launch. Scheduled to liftoff at 10:59 AM EDT, at 46 seconds, SpaceX called off the launch of Falcon 9 and the Starlink 10-7 mission from Launch Complex 39-A at Kennedy Space Center.

No official reason for the scrub was announced by the company.

Spectators gathered at the stop point on Playalinda Beach. This photo was made with about a minute left on the countdown. The launch scrubbed seconds later.

SpaceX is now targeting liftoff no earlier than 06:37 AM EDT (1037 UTC) on Monday, August 12th.

Weather

Tomorrow’s weather should offer conditions resulting in 95% GO weather-wise.

via 45th Weather Squadron, retrieved 08/11/2024 at 05:00 PM EDT

More launch information is here in our original preview article.

Read more

Falcon 9 late in first stage flight.
Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville

Lather, Rinse, Repeat: SpaceX plans to launch another set of twenty-three Starlink satellites, this time from Pad LC-39A at Kennedy Space Center.

The launch window is similar to last week’s Starlink 10-9 launch — it opens at 12:19 AM EDT and extends until 05:02 AM EDT the same day. Should weather or technical reasons arise and cause a delay, the company has a similar launch window Saturday, August 3.

After it completes its portion of the mission, the booster will land offshore on ASDS ‘A Shortfall Of Gravitas’, which is stationed offshore downrange on the Atlantic Ocean near the Carolinas. Since this is not a Return To Launch Site mission, no sonic booms will be heard on the Space Coast.

The launch will be SpaceX’s 76th of 2024 and its 15th launch from LC-39A this year. Overall, it will be the 386th SpaceX launch of all time.

At A Glance

  • Mission: Starlink 10-6
  • Date: NET August 2, 2024
  • Launch Window: 12:19 AM – 05:02 AM EDT*
  • Weather: 95% Go during the primary launch window
  • Organization: SpaceX
  • Rocket: Falcon 9
  • Trajectory: Northeastward
  • Launch Site: LC-39A, Kennedy Space Center
  • Booster Landing: Offshore on ASDS A Shortfall of Gravitas
  • Payload: Communications satellite to geosynchronous orbit.
  • Destination: Low-Earth Orbit

    * consult SpaceX website for the specific target for T-0.

Payload

The payload for this mission is a familiar one: twenty-three Starlink satellites. Starlink provides low-latency, high-bandwidth Internet connectivity to its customers.

Starlink orbital rendering by FetchCFD

Weather

General Forecast

Generally speaking, the threat of the usual afternoon and evening storms have died away for the evening by midnight, and tonight is no exception.

Temperature~81° F / 26.9°C
Humidity~90%
PrecipitationNone, Probably
Cloud cover~1% estimated
Windspeed (at ground level)12-14 MPH / 5.5 m/s
Visibility~8.7 miles / 14.0 km

As shown below, the 45th’s forecast states, “Storms will meander the Space Coast area but will subside in advance of the launch windows each day leaving just lingering dissipating clouds. Additionally, during the launch windows there is a small chance for nocturnal storms to develop over the water near the coastline, especially on Saturday morning. Primary concerns for each day would be the Cumulus Cloud Rule.”

That in mind, the 45th is forecasting only a 5% Probability of Violations for weather conditions, meaning that they rate chances for acceptable conditions at 95%. They also have rated the probability of a problem at the booster landing area as “low.”

The official forecast from the 45th Weather Squadron:

45th Weather Squadron’s forecast on August 1, 2024
Retrieved 11am 08/01/2024

Trajectory

The trajectory for the Starlink 10-6 mission is a familiar path: northeastward, the customary direction for SpaceX’s Group 10 Starlink launches. The rocket right-to-left if you are on the Space Coast and facing in the direction of the Atlantic Ocean.

Landing

After completing its part of the mission, the first stage booster will land offshore on the Automated Spaceport Drone Ship ‘A Shortfall Of Gravitas.’

As such, there will be no sonic boom on the Space Coast.

Online Viewing

SpaceCoastLaunchCalendar.com will have a livestream of the launch if you’re not able to watch the launch in person: Livestream

SpaceX will have a livestream of the launch on their website: Starlink 10-6. This will also be available on the X platform. Coverage starts about five minutes before liftoff.

Spaceflight Now will have coverage of the launch starting about one hour before liftoff on Youtube: link

For official updates regarding launch times, SpaceX.com is the best source of information. Starlink launch times change from time to time, and the company generally updates their website within minutes of the decision to change the launch time. This is very handy if none of the streaming options on YouTube have started their broadcasts.

Remember that there is a delay between a launch stream and the actual countdown clock. That is simply because of physics: it takes time for the signal to travel from the launch site, through the Internet, and back down to your phone, resulting in a five to fifteen-second delay.

Next Space Flight an app for iOS and Android phones, has a real-time countdown clock that is accurate to a second, give or take. The app is free. Search the App Store or Google Play. They are also on the web: nextspaceflight.com.

Launch Viewing: In Person

This morning’s planned launch is from LC-39A of the Eastern Range (KSC and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station combined.) The northern parks in Titusville on Washington Avenue and FL-528/A1A in Cape Canaveral are the best spots to watch liftoff directly.

Indirect Views

There are several excellent viewing spots for LC-39A launches that offer indirect views — meaning you won’t see the rocket until it clears obstructions such as trees, buildings, even a storm berm in one case.

  • Jetty Park, Port Canaveral
    • Fee required, much be purchased in advance: Port Canaveral Store
    • It’s very possible to see a cruise ship coming or going.
    • The pier especially has great views
  • Cocoa Beach
    • Parking fees (probably). Pay with your smartphone on the parking app. There are signs everywhere telling you how.
    • Further away, but still good views.
  • Southern Titusville Parks
    • Further away, but really nice views.

Restaurants With Good Launch Views

Given that the launch window opens after midnight and closes before dawn, local restaurants will be closed before liftoff and will not re-open before the end of the window.

Booster: unknown

SpaceX states “This is the 12th flight for the first stage booster supporting this mission, which previously launched Crew-6, O3b mPOWER, USSF-124, and eight Starlink missions.”

That’s Booster B1078, which last flew forty days ago as part of the Starlink 10-2 mission.

Booster B1078
Flight NumberPayloadDate
1Crew-6March 2, 2023
2O3b mPOWER 3 & 4April 28, 2023
3Starlink 6-4June 4, 2023
4Starlink 6-8August 7, 2023
5Starlink 6-16September 16, 2023
6Starlink 6-31December 3, 2023
7USSF-124February 14, 2024
8Starlink 6-46March 25, 2024
9Starlink 6-53April 23, 2024
10Starlink 6-60May 28, 2024
11Starlink 10-2June 23, 2024
Booster B1078 as of 06/23/2024
Liftoff of a Falcon 9 as seen from Cocoa Beach.
Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville

Countdown Timeline

There are key events in the countdown that you may hear called out in launch coverage.

Remember that once Propellant Loading (T-minus thirty-eight minutes) starts, Falcon 9 is committed to the launch attempt. Because of the nature of the cryogenic fuels used to power the rockets, any hold precludes a later launch attempt the same day. While it only rarely happens, there have been occasions where that has happened, and a launch scrub is called for the day’s attempt.

SpaceX provides the following countdown milestones on their mission information page:

Hours:Minutes:SecondsEvent
00:38:00SpaceX Launch Director verifies go for propellant load
00:35:00*RP-1 (rocket grade kerosene) loading begins
00:35:001st stage LOX (liquid oxygen) loading begins
00:16:002nd stage LOX loading begins
00:07:00Falcon 9 begins engine chill prior to launch
00:01:00Command flight computer to begin final prelaunch checks
00:01:00Propellant tank pressurization to flight pressure begins
00:00:45SpaceX Launch Director verifies go for launch
00:00:03Engine controller commands engine ignition sequence to start
00:00:00Falcon 9 liftoff
* after propellant loading begins, SpaceX is committed, and any holds until liftoff results in a scrub for the day. This is important if the weather is marginal.
Via SpaceX. SpaceX countdown timeline is presented for information purposes only and can be changed by the launch provider without notice.

Timeline of Falcon 9 Flight

SpaceX has published a timeline of expected events during the mission:

Hours:Minutes:SecondsEvent
00:00:00Liftoff
00:01:10Max-Q (Moment of peak mechanical stress on the rocket)
00:02:261st stage main engine cutoff (MECO)
00:02:301st and 2nd stages separate
00:02:362nd stage engine starts (SES-1)
00:02:57Fairing deployment
00:06:051st stage entry burn begins
00:06:281st stage entry burn ends
00:07:461st stage landing burn begins
00:08:141st stage landing
00:08:392nd stage engine cutoff (SECO-1)
00:54:402nd stage engine starts (SES-2)
00:54:422nd stage engine cutoff (SECO-2)
01:03:34Starlink satellites deploy
via: SpaceX. SpaceX flight timeline is presented for information purposes only and can be changed by the launch provider without notice.

All events up to the end of the 1st stage entry burn should be visible for launch spectators watching the launch in person, so long as clouds are not blocking the viewer’s line of sight.

Keep Up To Date With Space News

Keep up with launch news and other space events that affect the local area by subscribing to alerts when we publish a new article by entering your email at the link at the bottom of this page, or by visiting Space Talk here on the website. It’s free, and you can cancel at any time.

Read more

SpaceX Starship lifting off on the IFT-2 test from Boca Chica Texas. Photo: Richard P. Gallagher, Florida Media Now
SpaceX Starship lifting off on the IFT-2 test from Boca Chica Texas.
Photo: Richard P. Gallagher, Florida Media Now
SpaceX Starship lifting off on the IFT-2 test from Boca Chica Texas. Photo: Richard P. Gallagher, Florida Media Now

The Federal Aviation Administration, NASA and other parties have published a notice of intent to conduct an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for SpaceX Starship launches from Pad LC-39A at Kennedy Space Center, where it anticipates up to forty-four launches and landing at the facility.

A partially completed tower for those launches already stands at LC-39A, but construction was seemingly halted several months ago, and the launch pad was not finished. Now, it appears that plans are still very much active not only to launch Starship from Pad LC-39A, but also potentially from SLC-37 or a new launch pad, SLC-50, at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. An Environmental Impact Statement for the potential Cape Canaveral facility is already underway, with the initial public information portion already concluded. The draft for that study is expected late this year.

This Notice provides information to Federal, State, and local agencies; Native American tribes; and other interested persons regarding the FAA’s intent to prepare an EIS to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of issuing a commercial launch Vehicle Operator License to SpaceX for the Starship-Super Heavy launch vehicle at Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A) at Kennedy Space Center (KSC), Florida. SpaceX proposes to construct launch, landing, and other associated infrastructure at and in proximity to LC-39A. The proposal would also include Starship-Super Heavy launches at LC-39A; recoverable Super Heavy booster and Starship landings at LC-39A or on a droneship; and expendable Super Heavy booster and Starship landings in the ocean.

Via Federal Register

Starship tower under construction in 2022
Photo: Charles Boyer / ToT
Starship tower under construction in 2022 Photo: Charles Boyer / ToT

At this time, there has been no statement from any party as to whether this new EIS will affect the plans for the potential Starship facility being studied for Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. It could be one or the other, or most likely, both, given the high cadence of launches that SpaceX is planning for Starship.

Talk of Titusville contacted media officials at Kennedy Space Center regarding the timeline of the EIS, but they have not responded as of this time. Generally, an EIS period is between 6-12 months, but whether that is the case with the Starship EIS remains to be seen.

What Is An Environmental Impact Statement?

“The environmental impact statement (EIS) is a government document that outlines the impact of a proposed project on its surrounding environment. In the United States, these statements are mandated by federal law for certain projects. Environmental impact statements are meant to inform the work and decisions of policymakers and community leaders.”

“In the United States at the federal level, an EIS is a report mandated by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), to assess the potential impact of actions “significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.” This requirement under NEPA does not prohibit harm to the environment, but rather requires advanced identification and disclosure of harm. Examples include building, clean-up, and infrastructure projects. But the NEPA mandate is broader. Development projects that constitute major federal action, as defined by law, including those that use federal land, federal tax dollars, or are under federal agency jurisdiction, are required to assess the impact of a proposed project on the physical, cultural, and human environments affected by the proposed project. “

—American Bar Association

Today’s new filing adds some depth, “In September 2019, NASA completed a Final Environmental Assessment for the SpaceX Starship and Super Heavy Launch Vehicle at Kennedy Space Center to evaluate the potential environmental impacts resulting from construction and operations associated with the utilization of LC-39A for the SpaceX Starship-Super Heavy launch vehicle in practical applications.”

Additionally, “SpaceX now proposes to construct additional launch infrastructure not previously contemplated in the 2019 EA: a Super Heavy booster catch tower, a natural gas liquefaction system and air separation unit for propellant generation, and stormwater/deluge ponds. SpaceX also proposes to launch an advanced design of the Starship and Super Heavy vehicle (up to nine raptor engines for Starship and up to 35 raptor engines for the Super Heavy booster), operate at a projected higher launch tempo (up to 44 launches per year), and land the Super Heavy booster at LC-39A in support of its reusability concept. Starship landings are no longer proposed to occur at Landing Zone 1 at CCSFS.”

Accompanying propellant storage and distribution pipelines would also need to be constructed, especially if the launch cadence cited in the notice comes to pass. That, and SpaceX will need to construct fabrication, storage and refurbishment facilities for both the booster (the “Super Heavy” first stage) and the Starship, the now-familiar spacecraft that at first glance resembles a rocket from a 1950’s science fiction film.

Altogether, that would mean a lot of construction, along with the personnel to do the work. Afterward, a substantial number of people would also need to launch and maintain the Starship systems. All told, this could lead to significant economic activity on the Space Coast.

Starship At a Glance

Starship in flight in 2023. Photo by Richard Gallagher / Florida Media Now
Starship in flight in 2023. Photo by Richard Gallagher / Florida Media Now

Currently under development near Brownville, Texas, Starship is the largest and most powerful rocket ever built. According to SpaceX, it will be fully reusable, and capable of lifting 150 tons of payload to orbit in a reusable configuration, and 250 tons when it is configured as a conventional expendable rocket.

Current Starship designs are 397 feet tall, and 29.5 feet in diameter, producing some 16.7 million pounds of thrust at liftoff.

By comparison, the Saturn V rockets used for the Apollo Program were 362 feet tall, and produced 7.6 million pounds of thrust. By any measure, Starship is a huge rocket with immense power, and its launches and returns will be heard across the Space Coast.

Similar to how SpaceX Falcon 9 completes in many of its launches today, the Starship booster would return to land at its launch site when its task for the mission has been completed. Unlike Falcon 9, which lands at a landing area close by, Starship would return to its pad, where it would be grappled by “chopsticks” as it completed its final approach.

Starship is planned to be a fully reusable vehicle, meaning that its second stage (often simply called “the ship” in SpaceX parlance) would reenter and return to land at its launch pad using the same chopsticks as the booster.

Starship is still somewhat early in its development, with three test launches so far, and a fourth on the plate for the next few weeks. Along with SLS, it is a vehicle integral to Project Artemis, this time in the role of being the Human Landing System. HLS is where astronauts will land, live and work on the lunar surface, with the forward plan being for extended stays.

NASA rendering of the Artemis Human Landing System — a Starship variant — on the lunar surface.
Credit: NASA

2024 Document

You can read the notification document released today in the Federal Register (original link is above) from the link below:

Final Environmental Assessment for the SpaceX Starship and 
Super Heavy Launch Vehicle at Kennedy Space Center (KSC) 

If you are interested in reading the 2019 EIS that is mentioned above, here it is:

Read more