Space History: The Banana River Ballistic Missile

Photo: US Navy archives
On September 24, 1958, the first Polaris AX propulsion test vehicle was launched from Cape Canaveral’s Launch Complex 25. What happened next quickly became a part of local lore, with residents referring to the event for many years later as “The Banana River Ballistic Missile.”
Launch of The Banana River Missile
The Polaris rocket is a name familiar to many people of a certain age, as its existence was no secret and in fact, was widely discussed in serious circles as a major weapon in the Cold War.

Imagte: missilery.info
Indeed, Polaris was a cornerstone of the United States’ nuclear deterrent in the Cold War era, and was deployed from 1960-1978 aboard US Navy submarines as the country’s first Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) system. Initially, it had a 1,400 mile range and could carry a single one-megaton nuclear weapon. It was built by Lockheed Corporation, and used Aerojet (now L3 Aerojet Rocketdyne) engines.
September 24, 1958 was the debut launch of the Polaris, and at the time, any missile launch from Cape Canaveral was big news and a local draw. Launches happened far less than today, and in the early days of rocketry, a lot less predictable than a typical launch from the Cape is now. In short, launches were spectacular, were in vogue and were must-see events if one found themselves in east-central Florida.

Photo: US Navy archives.
Heavy crowds had gathered in the Cape Canaveral and Cocoa Beach areas to watch the launch, and they were treated to quite a spectacle. The missile launched, rose about one half of a mile, then problems began as the first Polaris missile launched from the Cape failed due to wild spinning from what was later determined to be a programming error.
Once it was clear that the test flight was not going according to plan, the errant missile was issued a self-destruct order by the Range Safety Officer on duty. The problem is that the second stage survived self-destruction and came crashing down in the Banana River, just offshore from the town of Cape Canaveral in the Banana River, much to the shock of the local residents.
Unfortunately, few pictures of the launch, the crowds or the aftermath of the launch failure are available today, and the event is largely beyond local living memory as we lose that generation to aging. Newspapers of the time covered it quite well, all considered, and here’s the story as they told it immediately after it happened:
Reactions In 1958
Oddly — or perhaps not so oddly — the major local newspaper on the Space Coast, The Cocoa Tribune, half-heartedly covered the event:

Cocoa was the hub town in the immediate Cape Canaveral area at the time, and it had the largest paper in the region. Their article consisted of this:

Other newspapers in Florida were far more thorough:

Newspaper accounts of the incident quote one R. B. Brossier, a Cocoa Beach developer at time: “It looked like it was coming right toward me,” Brossier said in 1958. “[The missile] went straight up in a normal flight. Then, at about 2000 feet or so altitude it suddenly turned southwest toward Cocoa and the mainland.”

The September 25, 1958 edition of the Miami Herald got an account from one of their employees (not a reporter), John E. Corea. He described the launch saying, “There was a crowd on the beach to watch. Everyone panicked. Mothers with kids tried to get the children out of the way but no one knew where to go.”
Corea then said that “It was 12:20 when it took off. It went up, I’d say, about a mile, then burst and started screaming down.
“The pieces fell right in the middle of the Banana River about 200 yards offshore. It came close to a trailer park west of Cocoa Beach.”
Corea concluded his account by saying, “Then smoke and bubbles started boiling out of the middle of the river. It looked like a geyser out there.”

The Orlando Sentinel’s article described the missile’s crash by recounting a Mrs. Brett Carver, who said that the failed missile landed just offshore from The Hitching Post trailer park, where it crashed into shallow water. Carver told reporters that the crashing Polaris second stage ‘flung a terrific mass of mud possibly as much as 1,000 feet skyward as the burning missile seemed to blow as it hit went under.’
Carver then added, “That’s when Bert and I started running towards our house. It threw debris up on shore. You could see quite a mass of debris in the water at first as it steamed and spewed after exploding and then it seemed to settle out of sight. That’s getting too close for me!”
Reporters at the time commented that the sight of the falling Polaris was visible as far away as Rockledge, some twelve miles southwest of Cape Canaveral. They also commented that no flames were visible from that far, which makes sense considering that only people nearby the crash scene reported seeing any fire.

from Google Maps
Aftermath
While undoubtedly the US Air Force, associated contractors and perhaps even local officials gathered together to piece together what happened that day, there were no high-profile investigations reported in the months after the event.
Cocoa’s newspaper — which had barely mentioned the incident in its pages in the days after the event, had a few quips in the following months from local columnists who made light of the misfire, calling it “The Banana River Ballistic Missile.” The name stuck.

Life in Cape Canaveral and surrounding towns went back to normal quickly after the event, but for decades afterwards, local lore kept a place for the Banana River Ballistic Missile, even if the exact story of what happened the day it was launched was largely forgotten.
Today
This reporter inquired at the Sands Museum if anyone there had any memories of the Banana River Ballistic Missile event, but unfortunately no one could be found to give Talk of Titusville a first-person retelling of the event. That’s no surprise, given that it happened over sixty years ago.
Visiting the site of the missile crash reveals no sign of the event’s occurrence, again, no surprise given the number of years that have passed. Looking at the crash site is hardly different than any other view of the Banana River in Cape Canaveral: quiet, beautiful and a nice place to fish or go boating but otherwise wholly unremarkable, save for the occasional dolphin surfacing or perhaps the water glowing on a summer night from natural bioluminescence.

Photo: Charles Boyer
The Hitching Post trailer park is still there, albeit with a different name, “Sea Shells.” Sea Shells is a quiet neighborhood tucked off of bustling A1A, across the street from Cape Canaveral’s City Hall. One of the streets in this neighborhood still bears the name “Hitching Post” and for all intents and purposes, it appears that little has changed at the location save for the homes present on the lots.

Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville
Could It Happen Again?
In a word, no. Today, such an event as the Banana River Ballistic Missile is highly unlikely in the extreme.
Compared to the 1950’s, safety requirements are far more stringent, and a launch trajectory that would allow a missile to land anywhere near a populated area is simply not allowed. If anything, “safe” trajectories are far more conservative than they were sixty-odd years ago.
Secondly, self-destruct systems on rockets are far more advanced than they were sixty-six years ago, and new rockets have automated systems that destroy a rocket when it deviates from the planned flight path far more thoroughly than in the old days.
In short, this was a one-off event and while it is an almost humorous bit of space history as seen through the lens of today, it almost certainly was something that was taken very seriously at the time and immediate improvements to safety systems was a short-term and a long-term result.
SpaceX, Falcon 9, Galileo L13, September 17, 2024

SpaceX launched Falcon 9 early this evening from Space Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.
Liftoff was at 06:51 PM EDT as the sun was starting to set to the west. Eight and a half minutes later, Booster B1067 touched down on ‘Just Read The Instructions’, completing its twenty-second mission.
SpaceX, Falcon 9, AST Mobile BlueBird 1-5, September 12, 2024
NASA Delays ESCAPADE Launch to 2025; New Glenn Maiden Flight Moved To November

Graphic: Blue Origin
NASA has decided to forego an attempt to launch the twin ESCAPADE in October aboard Blue Origin’s New Glenn on its maiden flight:
NASA announced Friday it will not fuel the two ESCAPADE (Escape and Plasma Acceleration and Dynamics Explorers) spacecraft at this time, foregoing the mission’s upcoming October launch window. While future launch opportunities are under review, the next possible earliest launch date is spring 2025.
The agency’s decision to stand down was based on a review of launch preparations and discussions with Blue Origin, the Federal Aviation Administration, and Space Launch Delta 45 Range Safety Organization, as well as NASA’s Launch Services Program and Science Mission Directorate.
NASA
In their press release announcing the delay, NASA also stated that they are exploring opportunities to launch the ESCAPADE satellites “no earlier than the Spring of 2025.”

Credits: James Rattray/Rocket Lab USA
“This is an important mission for NASA, and it’s critical we have sufficient margin in our prelaunch work to ensure we are ready to fly a tight planetary window,” said Bradley Smith, NASA’s Launch Services Office director at NASA Headquarters.
New Glenn Maiden Launch Shifts Right to NET November
Blue Origin stated on X.com today that New Glenn’s first launch will now be in November and will carry their Blue Ring satellite.
Rocket Lab Reacts
Rocket Lab, who built the two ESCAPADE probes, said this after the announcement:
SpaceX, Starlink 8-11, September 5, 2024
SpaceX, Starlink 8-10, August 31, 2024
FAA Clears Falcon 9 To Resume Flights

Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville
The Federal Aviation Administration has cleared SpaceX to resume Falcon 9 launches:
The SpaceX Falcon 9 vehicle may return to flight operations while the overall investigation of the anomaly during the Starlink Group 8-6 mission remains open, provided all other license requirements are met. SpaceX made the return to flight request on Aug. 29 and the FAA gave approval on Aug. 30.
The FAA

Shortly after the FAA made its announcement, the Space Force also made an announcement, seen at left:
US Space Force:
“Tomorrow morning, SLD 45 will support the Falcon 9 Starlink 8-10 launch.
The launch window opens Aug. 31 at 01:39 EDT (05:39 UTC). T-0 may vary.”
Polaris Dawn?
The crewed Polaris Dawn mission is currently on the launch pad at LC-39A waiting for improvements in the weather offshore in the abort zones. An official launch date has yet to be given for the twice-delayed mission.
There are several space schedule websites calling for a launch at 03:38 AM EDT Sunday, September 1st, but there has been no announcement of that being the case either by SpaceX or the Polaris Dawn team. Stay tuned.
FAA: Failed SpaceX Booster Landing Will Require An Investigation, Launch Schedule Effects Unknown

Talk of Titusville queried the FAA this morning to get a definitive statement from the agency as to whether it would require an investigation into the failed landing of Booster B1062 on last night’s Starlink 8-6 mission. Their reply is as follows:
The FAA is aware an anomaly occurred during the SpaceX Starlink Group 8-6 mission that launched from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida on August 28. The incident involved the failure of the Falcon 9 booster rocket while landing on a droneship at sea. No public injuries or public property damage have been reported. The FAA is requiring an investigation.
Background
An investigation is designed to further enhance public safety, determine the root cause of the event, and identify corrective actions to avoid it from happening again.
The FAA will be involved in every step of the investigation process and must approve SpaceX’s final report, including any corrective actions.
A return to flight of the Falcon 9 booster rocket is based on the FAA determining that any system, process, or procedure related to the anomaly does not affect public safety. In addition, SpaceX may need to request and receive approval from the FAA to modify its license that incorporates any corrective actions and meet all other licensing requirements.
-Federal Aviation Administration, August 28, 2024
The FAA also noted that the the information they provided is preliminary and subject to change.
Public Safety
Given that most Falcon 9 landings are at sea on automated drone ships, the question of “public safety” seems moot. No uninformed member of the general public was near the drone ship when the booster toppled, and in fact, no SpaceX or contractor personnel were aboard the drone ship either. No one was — the drone ship is automated during landing operations.
Notably, Falcon 9 and Booster B1062 seemingly had a normal ascent, second-stage separation and preparation for its landing sequence last night. Again, that points to the uninformed general public never being in danger.
Whether the FAA agrees with that assessment remains to be seen. It is also worth noting that SpaceX has had 267 consecutive successful Falcon 9 booster landings before last night.
The last failed booster landing for the company was on February 16, 2021, when Booster B1059 did not land successfully aboard ASDS ‘Of Course I Still Love You’ after launching Starlink 19. The next launch of Falcon 9 came on March 4, 2021, sixteen days after the Starlink 19 mishap.
Whether that roughly two-week period is a guideline for last night’s mishap investigation timeline remains to be seen.
Schedule Effects
The most important launch that this investigation could affect is Polaris Dawn, which is currently on its launch mount at LC-39A and tentatively scheduled to launch as soon as Friday.
SpaceX has not officially announced the date for the next Polaris Dawn launch attempt, and hopefully the company will provide more clarity regarding its plans and obligations in the coming days.






You must be logged in to post a comment.