FAA

A Falcon 9 launching from SLC-40 at Cape Canaveral in July 2024
Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville

The Federal Aviation Administration has cleared SpaceX to resume Falcon 9 launches:

The SpaceX Falcon 9 vehicle may return to flight operations while the overall investigation of the anomaly during the Starlink Group 8-6 mission remains open, provided all other license requirements are met. SpaceX made the return to flight request on Aug. 29 and the FAA gave approval on Aug. 30. 

The FAA

Shortly after the FAA made its announcement, the Space Force also made an announcement, seen at left:

US Space Force:
“Tomorrow morning, SLD 45 will support the Falcon 9 Starlink 8-10 launch.
The launch window opens Aug. 31 at 01:39 EDT (05:39 UTC). T-0 may vary.”

Polaris Dawn?

The crewed Polaris Dawn mission is currently on the launch pad at LC-39A waiting for improvements in the weather offshore in the abort zones. An official launch date has yet to be given for the twice-delayed mission.

There are several space schedule websites calling for a launch at 03:38 AM EDT Sunday, September 1st, but there has been no announcement of that being the case either by SpaceX or the Polaris Dawn team. Stay tuned.

Read more

Talk of Titusville queried the FAA this morning to get a definitive statement from the agency as to whether it would require an investigation into the failed landing of Booster B1062 on last night’s Starlink 8-6 mission. Their reply is as follows:

The FAA is aware an anomaly occurred during the SpaceX Starlink Group 8-6 mission that launched from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida on August 28. The incident involved the failure of the Falcon 9 booster rocket while landing on a droneship at sea. No public injuries or public property damage have been reported. The FAA is requiring an investigation.

Background
  
An investigation is designed to further enhance public safety, determine the root cause of the event, and identify corrective actions to avoid it from happening again. 
  
The FAA will be involved in every step of the investigation process and must approve SpaceX’s final report, including any corrective actions. 

A return to flight of the Falcon 9 booster rocket is based on the FAA determining that any system, process, or procedure related to the anomaly does not affect public safety. In addition, SpaceX may need to request and receive approval from the FAA to modify its license that incorporates any corrective actions and meet all other licensing requirements. 

-Federal Aviation Administration, August 28, 2024

The FAA also noted that the the information they provided is preliminary and subject to change.

Public Safety

Given that most Falcon 9 landings are at sea on automated drone ships, the question of “public safety” seems moot. No uninformed member of the general public was near the drone ship when the booster toppled, and in fact, no SpaceX or contractor personnel were aboard the drone ship either. No one was — the drone ship is automated during landing operations.

Notably, Falcon 9 and Booster B1062 seemingly had a normal ascent, second-stage separation and preparation for its landing sequence last night. Again, that points to the uninformed general public never being in danger.

Whether the FAA agrees with that assessment remains to be seen. It is also worth noting that SpaceX has had 267 consecutive successful Falcon 9 booster landings before last night.

The last failed booster landing for the company was on February 16, 2021, when Booster B1059 did not land successfully aboard ASDS ‘Of Course I Still Love You’ after launching Starlink 19. The next launch of Falcon 9 came on March 4, 2021, sixteen days after the Starlink 19 mishap.

Whether that roughly two-week period is a guideline for last night’s mishap investigation timeline remains to be seen.

Schedule Effects

The most important launch that this investigation could affect is Polaris Dawn, which is currently on its launch mount at LC-39A and tentatively scheduled to launch as soon as Friday.

SpaceX has not officially announced the date for the next Polaris Dawn launch attempt, and hopefully the company will provide more clarity regarding its plans and obligations in the coming days.

Read more

A seemingly abnormal buildup of material from Falcon 9’s second stage was seen in the livestream of SpaceX’s Starlink 9-3 mission last night. The livestream ended before the actual failure of the spacecraft occurred.
Photo: SpaceX livestream

Last night in California, SpaceX launched another group of Starlink satellites from California and experienced a failure of the second stage when the mission got to the point of a second burn intended to circularize the orbit of the spacecraft.

Company founder Elon Musk stated on the X platform that, “Upper stage restart to raise perigee resulted in an engine RUD for reasons currently unknown. Team is reviewing data tonight to understand root cause.

Starlink satellites were deployed, but the perigee may be too low for them to raise orbit. Will know more in a few hours.”

Musk added that “We’re updating satellite software to run the ion thrusters at their equivalent of warp 9. Unlike a Star Trek episode, this will probably not work, but it’s worth a shot. The satellite thrusters need to raise orbit faster than atmospheric drag pulls them down or they burn up.”

As Musk states, Warp 9 is from Star Trek, and in the show, that meant that the ship was traveling as fast as its engines allowed. That was only used in emergency situations, and that’s effectively what the Starlink satellites are in: a race to raise their orbit above atmospheric drag before they lose too much velocity and drop out of orbit. Since then, no update has been provided by SpaceX or Musk.

Last night’s failure ended a streak of 284 consecutive 100% mission successes for the company. It should be noted, however, that the first stage booster performed nominally, that it landed on the drone ship ‘Of Course I Still Love You’ offshore safely as intended and that prior to its failure that the second stage did achieve orbit, albeit one that may not be useful for the payload.

SpaceX Statement (July 12, 2024)

SpaceX made the following statement on its website this afternoon:

“On July 11, 2024, SpaceX launched Falcon 9 with 20 Starlink satellites from Space Launch Complex 4E at Vandenberg Space Force Base. Falcon 9’s first stage performed nominally, carrying the second stage and Starlink satellites to orbit, separating from the second stage as expected, and returning to Earth for a successful droneship landing, representing SpaceX’s 329th recovery of an orbital class rocket to-date.

Falcon 9’s second stage performed its first burn nominally. However, a liquid oxygen leak developed on the second stage. After a planned relight of the upper stage engine to raise perigee – or the lowest point of orbit – the Merlin Vacuum engine experienced an anomaly and was unable to complete its second burn. Although the stage survived and still deployed the satellites, it did not successfully circularize its orbit. This left the satellites in an eccentric orbit with a very low perigee of 135 km, which is less than half the expected perigee altitude.

The team worked overnight to make contact with the satellites in order to send early burn commands, but the satellites were left in an enormously high-drag environment only 135 km above the Earth (each pass through perigee removed 5+ km of altitude from the orbit’s apogee, or the highest point in the satellite orbit). At this level of drag, our maximum available thrust is unlikely to be enough to successfully raise the satellites. As such, the satellites will re-enter Earth’s atmosphere and fully demise. They do not pose a threat to other satellites in orbit or to public safety.

We greatly appreciate the team’s effort to learn as much as possible from the satellites and attempt recovery.

This event is a reminder of how technically challenging spaceflight is. To date, we have completed 364 successful Falcon launches – safely carrying astronauts, customer payloads and thousands of Starlink satellites to orbit – making the Falcon family of rockets one of the most reliable in the world. SpaceX will perform a full investigation in coordination with the FAA, determine root cause, and make corrective actions to ensure the success of future missions. With a robust satellite and rocket production capability, and a high launch cadence, we’re positioned to rapidly recover and continue our pace as the world’s most active launch services provider.”

Launch Replay

Here is a replay of SpaceX’s livestream of the Starlink 9-3 launch from last night:

Investigation Ahead

Of course, SpaceX will investigate the failure and try to identify its root cause(s) so it can take corrective action to prevent reoccurrence. In a Root Cause Analysis, or RCA investigation, data from the flight will be examined, as well as the manufacturing and test records associated with that particular second stage. From that flight data, the company will ascertain what failed and when, and from that they can begin to narrow down how it happened. Those investigations are thorough and take some time to complete. How long that takes is anyone’s guess.

SpaceX’s last in-flight failure occurred in 2015, when another second-stage failure ended some 139 seconds into flight. The resulting investigation led to a 180-day gap in Falcon 9 flights. It should be noted, however, that at the time SpaceX had far less experience launching Falcon 9 — the failed CRS-7 mission was the company’s 19th Falcon 9 flight and the next flight, Orbcomm 2-2 was its 20th. Thursday’s launch was SpaceX’s 69th Falcon 9 flight this year and the 354th since the rocket’s debut in 2010. That is quite a lot of in-flight experience, and that experience may well aid the company in identifying what went wrong and how to remediate the issue quickly.

FAA Statement

NASA Spaceflight, a leading space news organization, queried the FAA about the failure, and the FAA responded by saying, “The FAA is assessing the operation and will issue an updated statement if it is determined an investigation is warranted.”

Later, that statement was updated:

“The FAA is aware an anomaly occurred during the SpaceX Starlink Group 9-3 mission that launched from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California on July 11. The incident involved the failure of the upper stage rocket while it was in space. No public injuries or public property damage have been reported. The FAA is requiring an investigation.

An investigation is designed to further enhance public safety, determine the root cause of the event, and identify corrective actions to avoid it from happening again.

The FAA will be involved in every step of the investigation process and must approve SpaceX’s final report, including any corrective actions

A return to flight is based on the FAA determining that any system, process or procedure related to the mishap does not affect public safety. In addition, SpaceX may need to request and receive approval from the FAA to modify its license that incorporates any corrective actions and meet other licensing requirements.

The FAA responding to NASA Spaceflight, July 12, 2024

At this time, NASA, the US Space Force and NRO — three of SpaceX’s biggest governmental customers — have not made any public statement requiring their requirement of or participation in an investigation. Ostensibly, SpaceX will conduct the investigation working with the FAA and report the findings to those entities for their approval.

Launch Schedule Effects

With Falcon 9 now grounded by the FAA while an investigation is completed, missions such as Polaris Dawn, Crew 9, NG-21 and others are indefinitely delayed, as are any Starlink or customer launches currently on SpaceX’s manifest.

That said, the Starlink 10-4 mission scheduled for early Sunday morning from Space Launch Complex 40 is almost certainly delayed, pending a company announcement. Other missions later on the calendar are affected as well: GSAT-20, WorldView Legion 3 and 4, Arctic Satellite Broadband Mission (ASBM), Transporter 11 and others were manifested for the next 45 days from either Cape Canaveral, Kennedy Space Center or Vandenberg Space Force Base.

Regarding the upcoming private crewed Polaris Dawn mission that will be commanded by Jared Isaacman, Isaacman released this statement on X.com today:

“SpaceX has an incredible track record with Falcon9. I can say from personal experience they are very transparent when issues arise. I have no doubt they will arrive at a cause quickly and ensure the most cost-effective and reliable launch vehicle keeps delivering payload to orbit. As for Polaris Dawn, we will fly whenever SpaceX is ready and with complete confidence in the rocket, spaceship and operations.”

Jared Isaacman, July 11, 2024

Polaris Dawn had been scheduled to fly NET July 31, but that mission is now delayed pending the mishap investigation and the implementation of remediations.

Read more

Starship Heavy on its launch pad in Texas.
Photo: Richard Gallagher / Florida Media Now

During those meetings, people can learn more about the proposed activity in an open house information station format, where the FAA will provide information describing the purpose of the scoping meetings, project schedule, opportunities for public involvement, Proposed Action and alternatives summary, and environmental resource area summary. The meetings will not be hearings, instead, they are designed to provide information.

That said, written and oral comments will be accepted, so it is your chance to make your voice heard, yay or nay. Talk of Titusville encourages you to take the time to attend, learn, and if you are so inclined, to leave your comments.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-7-1024x584.png
Public Information Session at The Radisson in Cape Canaveral in March for the SLC-37/50 Pads at Cape Canaveral. The ones for KSC / LC-39A will be much the same.
Photo: Charles Boyer / ToT

Official Document from FAA

Here is the official document for the Proposed Action. Interested parties should take the time to read it. You can either download it from here, or if you prefer, from the FAA directly at www.faa.gov/media/80626. Reading the information beforehand may give you better insight to ask more informed questions if you attend one of the informational meetings.

Meeting Information

The meetings will be informational, and not public hearings. The public hearings will come later in the process.

That’s important to keep in mind — if you want to make your voice heard, the best way to do so is in writing at the address mentioned below. You can submit written comments at the informational sessions, and a court reporter will also be present to transcribe your comments, as well.

June 12, 2024, 2pm-4pm and 6pm-8pm (Eastern)
IN-PERSON
Radisson Cape Canaveral, Jamaica Room
8701 Astronaut Blvd
Cape Canaveral, FL 32920

June 13, 2024, 6pm-8pm (Eastern)
IN-PERSON
Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex
Space Commerce Way
Merritt Island, FL 32953

June 17, 2024, 6pm-8pm (Eastern)
VIRTUAL / ONLINE
URL and call-in information will be provided prior to the meeting at https://www.faa.gov/space/stakeholder_engagement/spacex_starship_ksc

Opportunity For Written Comments

Submitting Written Comments:

According to today’s press release, “The FAA invites interested agencies, organizations, Native American Tribes, and members of the public to submit comments to inform the FAA on the significant issues to be analyzed in depth in the EIS (e.g., range of actions, alternatives, environmental impacts). The public scoping period starts with the publication of the Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS in the Federal Register. To ensure sufficient time to consider issues identified during the public scoping period, comments should be submitted by one of the methods listed below no later than June 24, 2024. All comments will receive the same attention and consideration in the preparation of the EIS.”

“Comments, statements, or questions concerning scoping issues must be identified with the Docket Number FAA-2024-1395 and may be provided to the FAA as follows:

  • Federal E-Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Retrieve the docket by conducting a search for “FAA-2024-1395” and follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Please note that the FAA will post all comments on the Internet without changes, including any personal information provided.
  • By U.S. mail to Ms. Eva Long, FAA Environmental Protection Specialist, c/o Leidos, 2877 Guardian Lane, Virginia Beach, VA 23452.”
Read more