Flight of Starlink 10-29 Photo: Chris Leymarie, Florida Media Now
SpaceX continued adding to its Starlink constellation last night when it sent another group of 28 Mini V2 satellites to orbit late last evening. Dubbed Starlink 10-29, liftoff was at 11:37 PM ET from Space Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.
Booster B1069 flew for the 26th time during the mission, and afterwards, it landed offshore aboard ASDS ‘Just Read The Instructions,’ one of SpaceX’s two automated landing platforms assigned to the Eastern Range. B1069 and ‘JRTI’ will now return to Port Canaveral, where the booster will be offloaded and transported to SpaceX’s Hangar X facility at Kennedy Space Center. There it will be refurbished and prepared for its next flight.
Launch Replay
Next Launch
Tomorrow afternooon, SpaceX and NASA are planning to launch four astronauts to ISS as part of Crew-11.
SpaceX Crew‑11 Mission Details
Mission
SpaceX Crew‑11
Organization
SpaceX
Location
Kennedy Space Center, FL, USA
Rocket
Falcon 9 Block 5
Pad
Launch Complex 39A
Status
Go for Launch
Status Info
Current T‑0 confirmed by official or reliable sources.
Window Opens
Thursday, 07/31/2025 12:09:20 PM EDT
Window Closes
Thursday, 07/31/2025 12:09:20 PM EDT
Destination
Low Earth Orbit (ISS)
Mission Description
Crew‑11 is the 11th operational crewed flight of a Crew Dragon spacecraft to the International Space Station under NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, carrying four astronauts to the ISS.
Bumper 8 lifts off on July 24, 1950 Photo: US Army
Tempus fugit, a lot of clocks say: “time is fleeting.” For a facility as established and enduring as Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, it might seem like forever since the first rocket launched from here. Time has flown and so have thousands of rockets and missiles from America’s premier spaceport. Truth is, CCSFS has been open “only” 75 years, but it continues to have a bright future not only today but also for the long-term future.
On July 24, 1950, a spit of land without much more than scrub grass, sand dunes, and millions of mosquitoes erupted with thunder as a two-stage rocket named Bumper 8 became the first vehicle ever launched from Cape Canaveral. At 9:28 a.m., an ignition flash and roar marked not just a technical achievement, but the start of the Space Age in America.
The Bumper 8 mission was managed by the U.S. Army, specifically the Army Ordnance Corps in cooperation with the newly formed Long Range Proving Ground (LRPG), which would later evolve into the Army Ballistic Missile Agency, ABMA. It would be ABMA and not NASA that launch the United State’s entrance into orbital launches when Explorer I flew not far from where Bumper 8 launched. Eventually, ABMA was largely folded into the United States’ fledgling space agency, NASA.
The Bumper 8 launch was the product of collaboration between military engineers, scientists—many of them veterans of World War II rocketry—and support from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which developed the WAC Corporal upper stage.
Bumper 8 on its launch mount at Cape Canaveral. Photo: US Army
Technically, Bumper 8 was a Frankenstein’s monster of its era: a German V-2 missile (originally designed for wartime attacks on London and Antwerp), repurposed by American engineers, with a U.S.-built WAC Corporal sounding rocket bolted to the nose. The V-2 served as the first stage, firing for about 60 seconds and pushing the assembly to an altitude of roughly 10 miles and a speed of over 3,500 miles per hour before flaming out.
The afternoon edition of the Orlando Evening Star had coverage of the Bumper 8 launch.
Once at altitude, the WAC Corporal ignited, its smaller engine firing for another 40 seconds, pushing the second stage even higher and faster. Engineers tracking the flight from hastily assembled bunkers confirmed that the rocket reached more than 10 miles in altitude—far less than some later Bumper flights, but still a triumph for a first attempt at a brand-new site.
“I remember standing behind the blast shield, feeling the ground tremble and wondering if all our calculations would hold up,” recalled one young Army engineer present for the launch. “We had no idea what would happen—whether it would explode on the pad, veer out to sea, or fly as intended. When those engines lit, it was like watching the future arrive in a ball of fire.”
For the military brass, Bumper 8 was about more than scientific curiosity. In 1950, America’s nerves were raw. The Soviet Union had exploded its first atomic bomb less than a year before, and Cold War tensions colored every decision. The Korean War had erupted only a month prior, raising the stakes for missile and rocket research. The Pentagon needed to demonstrate that the U.S. could not only match but surpass its adversaries in missile technology.
The location for the launch—then just an isolated strip of sand and scrub known more for fishing and mosquitoes was chosen for its safety and isolation, allowing spent rocket stages to fall harmlessly into the Atlantic. The Long Range Proving Ground was as makeshift as its name suggested: a single concrete pad (Launch Complex 3), sandbag bunkers for the launch team, and primitive communications equipment. The workforce was a mixture of Army soldiers, civilian engineers, and, in the background, several German scientists brought over after World War II under Operation Paperclip.
That day, the Bumper 8’s upper stage did not set an altitude record—it was later flights in the Bumper series that would push into the edge of space. But the launch proved that Cape Canaveral could support rocketry of increasing sophistication. The Cape quickly became a focal point for military missile programs—Redstone, Atlas, and Titan, all tested here, laying the groundwork for the coming space race. Redstone would carry Alan Shepard on the first US crewed mission, Atlas would carry John Glenn to orbit and an iteration of Titan would be the booster of choice for the Gemini Program.
It wasn’t just about hardware and geopolitics. There was an undeniable thrill for those on the ground. “I had never seen anything like it—the way that thing leapt off the pad,” said Mary Pinson, the wife of an ABMA engineer. “We were sweating in the Florida heat, covered in mosquito bites, and when the rocket launched, we knew we were watching history.”
Missile Row, in 1964, as seen from the vicinity of LC-36, where Blue Orgin launches New Glenn. This is also a view of the shoreline of the old Titusville Beach after it was transformed into the tip of the spear of the US space effort. Playalinda is also visible here. Photo: NASA
Things Are Always Changing At The Cape
Within a decade, the stakes shifted from military defense to exploration. The Soviet launch of Sputnik in 1957 galvanized the United States, leading to the creation of NASA in 1958. ABMA was all but absorbed by NASA, which in turn put its technical development center in Huntsville, where most were already working: at Redstone Arsenal. The Army and Air Force test ranges merged into what became the Eastern Test Range, and Cape Canaveral was transformed almost overnight from a sleepy fishing village into the very center of the high-tech world.
In 1962, the area grew even larger when the Launch Operations Center (LOC) was established immediately to the north of Cape Canaveral as an independent NASA field center. In November 1963, President Lyndon Johnson designated the facilities of the Launch Operations Center and Station No. 1 of the Atlantic Missile Range as the John F. Kennedy Space Center to honor the fallen president.
The Space Coast was born.
Kennedy Space Center Is Born, But A Price
The Launch Operations Center (later renamed as KSC) was founded out of necessity and ambition. In 1961, after President John F. Kennedy set the national goal to land a man on the Moon by the end of the decade, NASA realized it needed much more space for larger rockets, new facilities, and increased activity. The original launch site at Cape Canaveral—where Bumper 8 and dozens of military and civilian rockets had flown—was crowded, fragmented, and mostly run by the military. There was no room for the Vehicle Assembly Building, the giant crawlerways, or the miles of safety buffer required for the Saturn V.
NASA, with support from Congress, quickly began acquiring land west and north of the Cape. The chosen site was Merritt Island: a mix of wetlands, scrub, orange groves, small farms, fishing villages, and a handful of beach communities like Allenhurst, Shiloh, and the lively Titusville Beach. The acquisition was the largest forced relocation in NASA’s history. Over 80,000 acres (about 125 square miles) were taken—mostly through federal purchase but also through eminent domain when owners resisted. This area included the future footprint of KSC and a vast buffer zone for safety.
Compared to Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS), Kennedy Space Center is much larger. Today, KSC spans about 144,000 acres. CCSFS is roughly 15,800 acres. That means KSC covers nearly ten times the land of CCSFS, with much of it remaining undeveloped as a buffer.
The human cost for the construction of KSC was significant. More than 1,000 families were displaced in the 1960s. The thriving black community of Allenhurst, the farming hamlet of Orsino, and most of tiny Shiloh disappeared. In total, at least 5,000 people lost their homes.
Titusville Beach—a small but beloved oceanfront community where locals and visitors came to swim, picnic, and fish—was erased. All but one of its buildings were demolished, its dunes bulldozed, and public access to the beach was cut off as NASA established a controlled area. And the building that was preserved? You may have guessed it. The Astronaut Beach House, a two-story cottage, was built in 1962 as a part of the then Neptune Beach subdivision, between where pads 40 and 41 stand today. NASA preserved and maintained the house through the years, and now its provenance is almost forgotten. There were other homes too: the town itself stretched to the other side of LC-39A.
A 1952 road map showing the location of Titusville Beach. The “False Cape” is common landmark on maps of the area, even today. map via: North Brevard Historical Society & Museum
With so much of the land needed only as a safety buffer, NASA partnered with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to preserve public access to the area. In 1963, the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge was officially established, covering almost the entire non-operational area of Kennedy Space Center. It is a low-security zone except for launches deemed by KSC safety or security to require temporary exclusion from MINWR.
The result is an unusual coexistence: high-tech launch pads surrounded by protected wetlands, lagoons, and forests. The Refuge is now home to over 1,500 species of plants and animals, including endangered species like the Florida scrub-jay, manatees, and bald eagles. Today, MINWR hosts 2.3 million visitors annually.
LC-39A lighting up the night in the distance, as seen from Biolab Road in Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge. The aptly named “Mosquito Lagoon” is to the left. Photo: Charles Boyer
The Shuttle era brought another transformation, with KSC serving as the base for over 130 shuttle flights from 1981 to 2011. The Cape weathered tragedy—like the AS-204 Apollo I fire, the loss of Challenger in 1986 and Columbia in 2003—but the NASA and its engineers adapted each time, building safer systems and deeper expertise for future space endeavours.
Today, KSC is largely the domain of SpaceX, and the company launches not only crewed missions, but also Falcon Heavy and soon, Starship Heavy from LC-39A. The company has built a large work center at Kennedy, with plans to expand greatly. NASA is staying busy too, as the VAB is still in use, this time to build the SLS rockets that are part of Project Artemis, which aims to return humans to the moon and perhaps even beyond. Instead of LC-39A, Artemis uses LC-39B, the lesser used of the two megapads.
MINWR. Photo: Charles Boyer
Seventy-five years after Bumper 8’s fiery ascent, Cape Canaveral stands as a testament to American resolve and the relentless drive to explore. From makeshift pads and scavenged missiles, to the front lines of interplanetary exploration and the only place on Earth that was the starting point for vehicles now in interstellar space, the legacy of Cape Canaveral is written in thunder—one launch at a time.
A SpaceX Falcon 9 awaiting launch at SLC-40 in Cape Canaveral
SpaceX is set to launch Falcon 9 and the SES-operated O3b mPower satellites this evening from Space Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral. Liftoff is set for 05:12 PM ET, with a two hour window extending to 07:12 PM ET.
Official weather forecasts have given the mission a 50/50 chance for acceptable weather, with roughly a 25% chance of thunderstorms in the launch area during the launch window. Keep in mind that acceptable conditions consider more than just rain, it also includes thunderstorm activity in the launch area as well as the lightning potential in the immediate vicinity of the rocket. To learn more about launch commit criteria, click here.
Boeing’s 9th and 10th O3b mPOWER satellites—launched in partnership with SES—will bolster the company’s push to deliver global connectivity from space. Leveraging Boeing’s fully software-defined payload technology, these satellites can dynamically allocate power to match user demand.
Today will mark the sixth mission for Falcon 9 first stage booster B1096, and after completing its share of the mission, the booster will touch down offshore on ASDS ‘Just Read The Instructions.’
Weather
The 45th Weather Squadron of Space Launch Delta 45 of the US Space Force gives a 50% chance for weather to be acceptable during the launch window:
SpaceX will have a livestream of the launch on their website: O3B MPower Mission. This will also be available on the X platform. Coverage starts about fifteen minutes before liftoff.
Spaceflight Now will have coverage of the launch starting about one hour before liftoff on Youtube: link
For official updates regarding launch times, SpaceX.com is the best source of information. Starlink launch times change from time to time, and the company generally updates their website within minutes of the decision to change the launch time. This is very handy if none of the streaming options on YouTube have started their broadcasts.
Remember that there is a delay between a launch stream and the actual countdown clock. That is simply because of physics: it takes time for the signal to travel from the launch site, through the Internet, and back down to your phone, resulting in a five to fifteen-second delay.
Next Space Flight an app for iOS and Android phones, has a real-time countdown clock that is accurate to a second, give or take. The app is free. Search the App Store or Google Play. They are also on the web: nextspaceflight.com.
Launch Viewing: In Person
The best free options are available for spectators: Northern Titusville parks on Washington Avenue / US-1 are your best bets: Space View Park, Sands Park, Rotary Riverfront Park.
The Space Bar will be open through the launch window. New York New York in Titusville will be open to roughly 7 PM, and is a great place to watch as well. Restaurants in Port Canaveral, specifically Gators Dockside, Fishlips and Grills Seafood should have good views after the rocket clears obstructions.
A Timelapse of Falcon 9’s ascent on the Kuiper KF-01 Mission Photo: SpaceX
SpaceX launched 27 Kuiper satellites for Amazon aboard a Falcon 9 last night from Space Launch Complex 41 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. Liftoff was at 2:30 AM ET.
This morning’s launch was the debut flight for SpaceX’s newest Falcon 9 booster, B1096. It flew flawlessly, and touched down safely aboard ASDS ‘A Shortfall of Gravitas’ about eight and a half minutes after liftoff. B1096 and ASOG will now return to Port Canaveral in a few days, where the booster will be offloaded and returned to SpaceX’s Hangar X at Kennedy Space Center. There, it will be inspected, refurbished and prepared for its next mission.
While the first stage was touching down at sea, the second stage and payload continued towards orbit, which it achieved roughly at the same time as B1096’s touchdown. At T+0:52:43, the second stage was reignited to place the payloads in the final orbit, and the payload released shortly thereafter.
Successful deployment of all KF-01 satellites confirmed
Project Kuiper, a subsidiary of Amazon founded in April 2019, will deploy a constellation of 3,236 Low Earth orbit satellites to deliver low-latency broadband connectivity worldwide. The Federal Communications Commission granted Amazon approval on July 30, 2020, to launch and operate half of its satellites (1,618) by July 30, 2026, with the remainder due by July 30, 2029, and service is slated to begin once the first 578 satellites are in orbit. Under the leadership of president Rajeev Badyal, Kuiper Systems LLC is positioning itself to bridge digital divides and support Amazon Web Services clients across underserved regions.
If that sounds just like Starlink, it is, more or less. The two services are competitors, albeit a competition with Starlink that is many years, thousands of satellites, and millions of customers ahead of Amazon, who is just getting started building out their constellation.
Full‐scale deployment of Project Kuiper commenced in April 2025 with United Launch Alliance’s Atlas V rockets launching the initial batches, followed by a second Atlas V mission on June 23.
Amazon has earmarked around $23 billion for Kuiper’s build-out, primarily to cover launch and manufacturing costs, and projects annual revenue of $7.2 billion by 2032 with up to seven million subscribers. The company has secured 92 launches from United Launch Alliance, ArianeGroup, and Blue Origin—along with additional slots on SpaceX rockets—to accelerate its rollout, and plans three consumer service tiers offering speeds up to one gigabit per second.
As Amazon races to match SpaceX’s Starlink, which already boasts over six million users, Project Kuiper represents a strategic bet on owning its digital infrastructure and tapping into a satellite internet market forecast to exceed $1 trillion in the coming decade.
Work on SpaceX’s Starship tower at LC-39A is underway. In the background, the Falcon 9 that carried the Ax-4 mission to orbit in a Crew Dragon is visible. Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville
July 11, 2025: it’s been over a year since the public scoping period for the FAA’s Environmental Impact Statement, and no Draft EIS or even a date for one has been announced for SpaceX’s Starship-Super Heavy project at Launch Complex 39A at KSC.
Casual onlookers may wonder if something is awry, but that’s probably not the case. The wheels of government turn slowly and often do so silently, and an announcement could come any day.
Two Separate Facilities, Two Seperate EIS
Many people who don’t live at the Space Coast don’t realize that Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station are two adjoining but separately managed facilities. NASA operates KSC, of course, and SpaceX leases LC-39A from the government at KSC. Cape Canaveral SFS, located southeast of Kennedy, is a US Space Force Military facility and is operated by the Department of the Air Force. SpaceX leases SLC-40 at CCSFS and seeks to lease LC-37 there.
There are even gates between the two facilities, though they don’t seem to ever close. There is great cooperation between the Space Force and NASA, and they often work together when needed.
In this facilities map, the two different facilities that make up KSC and Cape Canaveral Space Force station are clearly visible. In green is KSC and in yellow is CCSFS Map: NASA
That’s important, because there are two authorities conducting two Environmental Impact Statements for two different launch pads: LC-37 and LC-39A. The former is the retired site of United Launch Alliance’s Delta IV Heavy rocket, which flew its last flight last year.
The last Delta IV Heavy on the launch pad at LC-37 last year. It’s successful flight marked the end of an era. Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville
The latter, LC-39A, is of course the historic launch facility that served Apollo and STS (Shuttle) missions in its long and storied career. SpaceX has made their own history at LC-39A: the return of crew to orbit after a long gap following the end of the Shuttle program, the launch site of Falcon Heavy and other commercial spaceflight firsts.
Apollo 17 stands tall at LC-39A in 1972. It was the penultimate launch of a Saturn V. Photo: NASA
Current Status
The EIS process for LC-39A continues to be underway. No statements otherwise have been released by any of the parties involved, so it is safe to say that work is continuing.
SpaceX is preparing the EIS under FAA supervision, analyzing the environmental impacts of proposed Starship-Super Heavy operations, including up to 44 launches per year, infrastructure construction; a Super Heavy booster catch tower, propellant systems, and stormwater/deluge ponds), and landings at LC-39A or on a droneship.
The process is evaluating changes from the 2019 Environmental Assessment (EA), which found no significant impact but did not account for the current scope of operations. The next step is the release of the draft EIS for public review and comment, followed by a final EIS and a Record of Decision.
Release Date of the LC-39A Draft EIS
There is no specific release date publicly announced for the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for SpaceX’s Starship-Super Heavy project at LC-39A at Kennedy Space Center. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) initiated the EIS process with a Notice of Intent published on May 9, 2024, and held public scoping meetings in June 2024.
Based on typical EIS timelines (often 12-18 months) and the FAA’s ongoing work, the draft EIS is likely to be released in mid-to-late 2025. For comparison, the draft EIS for Starship launches at Space Launch Complex 37 (SLC-37) at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station was released on June 6, 2025, after a scoping period starting in February 2024, fifteen months earlier. The LC-39A EIS Draft should come in the next 5-6 months, or roughly the same time as a final decision on LC-37 is due, according to DAF project timelines.
New Federal NEPA Rules
The FAA has issued a notice rescinding its existing National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) implementing procedures outlined in FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, and replacing them with streamlined procedures in FAA Order 1050.1G. This change is driven by Executive Order 14154 of the President, entitled “Unleashing American Energy.”
The new order accelerates environmental reviews projects by imposing strict timelines and page limits on EISs (e.g., 2-year completion cap), expanding CATEX (Categorical Exclusion) usage, allowing combined exclusions, and promoting early collaboration to minimize delays. This aligns with the Trump Administration’s policy to expedite permitting. That could potentially benefit commercial space operators like SpaceX by shortening review periods for future licenses or modifications, thus supporting faster integration of technologies like Starship.
However, for the specific ongoing EIS for SpaceX’s Starship-Super Heavy operations at LC-39A, the new rules should not apply directly. Order 1050.1G applies only to FAA actions requiring environmental review that “commence on or after” July 3, 2025, and since the LC-39A EIS was started in 2024, the new order is moot.
Responsible Agencies
There is a mix of federal agencies responsible for completing aspects of the LC-39A EIS.
Lead Agency:Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), responsible for overseeing the EIS process and issuing a commercial launch Vehicle Operator License to SpaceX if the final decision of the EIS is to allow work on 39A to proceed.
Preparing Entity: SpaceX, tasked with preparing the EIS under FAA supervision.
Multiple Cooperating Agencies:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): Manages KSC and leases LC-39A to SpaceX, providing oversight for space-related activities.permits.performance.gov
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS): Manages the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, which includes KSC property, and provides expertise on wildlife impacts.permits.performance.gov
National Park Service (NPS): Oversees Canaveral National Seashore, partially within KSC boundaries, and contributes expertise on affected lands.permits.
U.S. Coast Guard (USCG): Involved due to maritime safety and airspace closures for launches.
Department of the Air Force (DAF): Coordinates due to proximity to Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and shared range.
For the most current LC-39A information, check the FAA’s website (www.faa.gov) or the project-specific page at :
In the overnight hours this morning, SpaceX achieved a landmark in its launch manifest: the company’s 500th Falcon 9 flight. Launching on its 500th mission overall, the Falcon 9 rocket roared off from Space Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station at 2:28 a.m. EDT (0628 UTC).
The flight also set a new high-water mark for booster reuse, as first stage B1067 chalked up its 29th trip to space and back when it touched down safely aboard ASDS ‘A Shortfall of Gravitas.’ That’s more flights than any other Falcon booster on record. To put it into perspective, this morning’s flight of B1067 is one more than Columbia, the Shuttle orbiter that flew 28 missions before tragedy struck it and its crew during re-entry in February 2003. It is also ten less than the all-time reuse leader, STS Orbiter Discovery, which flew 39 missions with the last being STS‑133 in March 2011. SpaceX has stated that their goal for Falcon 9 booster reuse is forty mission, and at this point in time, B1067 is nearly three-quarters of the way there.
Booster B1067 and ‘A Shortfall of Gravitas’ will now return to Port Canaveral, where the booster will be offloaded, returned to SpaceX’s Hangar X at Kennedy Space Center for inspection, refurbishment and preparation for its next mission at some date in the future.
Starlink Notes
Starlink 10-25 was the first Starlink launch of July and deployed 27 Starlink V2 Mini-Optimized satellites into a 279-kilometer orbit inclined 53.2 degrees to the equator. After a textbook ascent on a northeast trajectory, the second stage released its payload approximately 55 minutes after liftoff, marking another routine deployment for SpaceX’s rapidly growing broadband constellation.
Timelapse of Starlink 10-25 Photo: SpaceX
Starlink 10-25 added to the more than 7,900 operational satellites that make up the world’s largest low-Earth-orbit constellation, designed to deliver high-speed internet to underserved and remote regions around the globe. This latest batch of V2 Mini satellites is optimized for quicker deployment and greater data throughput, continuing SpaceX’s strategy of incremental upgrades to the network’s overall performance.
Beating The Weather
Meteorologists from the U.S. Space Force’s 45th Weather Squadron had forecast a 90 percent chance of favorable conditions for the pre-dawn launch, with only scattered cumulus clouds expected to drift through the Cape Canaveral area. Skies remained clear at ignition, ensuring uninterrupted visibility for the mission’s live webcast and ground observers alike.
Launch Replay
Next Launch
Setting
Value
Mission
Falcon 9 Block 5 | Starlink Group 10-28 Awaiting Confirmation
Organization
SpaceX
Location
Cape Canaveral SFS, FL, USA
Rocket
Falcon 9
Pad
Space Launch Complex 40
Status
To Be Confirmed
Status Info
Awaiting official confirmation – current date is known with some certainty.
Window Opens
Tuesday, 07/08/2025 1:48:00 AM
Window Closes
Tuesday, 07/08/2025 5:48:00 AM
Destination
Low Earth Orbit
Mission Description
A batch of satellites for the Starlink mega-constellation – SpaceX’s project for space-based Internet communication system.
Atlas V with the Kuiper 2 payload at LC-41. Photo: United Launch Alliance
Amazon’s satellite internet project, Kuiper, will continue its deployment today with the planned launch of the Kuiper K-02 mission at 1:25 PM ET aboard an United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V 551 rocket. This mission will deliver 27 operational satellites into low Earth orbit, adding to the 27 satellites deployed earlier this year in April.
The Kuiper project is Amazon’s initiative to provide broadband internet service through a constellation of satellites. Today’s launch is the second of a series that aims to meet the conditions set by the Federal Communications Commission, which require half of the planned 3,236 satellites to be in orbit by mid-2026. The full network is expected to be completed by mid-2029.
The Atlas V 551 rocket, used for this launch, is among ULA’s more powerful configurations. It includes five solid rocket boosters and a medium payload fairing.
Following deployment, the satellites will be elevated from their initial orbit of approximately 450 kilometers to an operational altitude of around 630 kilometers. From this position, they will begin supporting future broadband service coverage as part of Amazon’s long-term strategy to enter the satellite internet market.
Operational Strategy and Technology Capabilities
Each satellite in the Kuiper constellation is equipped with propulsion and communication technologies to maintain orbit and link with both ground stations and other satellites. The system includes inter-satellite laser links, which allow the satellites to pass data directly between one another. These optical links are designed to support high-throughput connections, improving the flexibility and resilience of the network.
The K-02 mission represents the continued transition from prototype to full-scale operations. The first launch in April tested Amazon’s satellite bus and operational model. With K-02, Amazon is moving forward with production models that are expected to serve as a foundational layer of the broader constellation. The mission is part of a deployment strategy that includes multiple launch providers and vehicle types, including upcoming launches on ULA’s Vulcan Centaur, SpaceX Falcon 9, and the European Ariane 6.
Amazon has publicly committed more than $10 billion to the development and deployment of the Kuiper constellation. The company is building out supporting infrastructure in tandem with the satellites, including user terminals and ground communication sites. The terminals, developed in-house, are designed to be compact and cost-effective. Amazon has said these terminals will support download speeds up to 400 Mbps and will be priced under $400, though full commercial service has not yet begun.
In the near term, newly launched satellites will undergo a series of health and status checks, after which their thrusters will be used to reach final orbit. Amazon’s Kuiper operations team, based in Redmond, Washington, is managing the process, which includes positioning, testing communication links, and preparing the satellites to eventually join the active broadband network.
The last Delta IV Heavy at LC-37A stands at the launch pad in April 2024. The rocket family is now retired and the infrastructure in this photo is now demolished. Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville
Much of the infrastructure at Launch Complex 37’s launch pad was demolished in a controlled explosion today, marking the end of one era and the beginning of another. For those who knew the site, who watched Delta IV rockets claw their way into orbit or remembered the echoes of the Apollo era, the moment was as much about letting go of the past as it was embracing the future.
Out With The Old, In With The New
The primary targets of Thursday’s demolition were the massive Mobile Service Tower and supporting infrastructure built for Delta IV operations. These towering steel and concrete structures were no longer needed and stood as reminders of a program that had fulfilled its mission. Shortly after 9:00 AM ET a series of explosive charges, precisely placed along key support points, triggered a cascading collapse. Within seconds, the launch tower folded in on itself, kicking up clouds of dust that drifted over the grounds where giants once stood.
Apollo 5 launches from LC-37 on January 22, 1968 Photo: NASA
Crews began rigging the complex for demolition earlier this spring, following the final Delta IV Heavy launch in April 2024. Afte that final flight, United Launch Alliance (ULA) has fully retired the Delta family, closing the door on a long-running chapter in the US launch industry. The demolition marks the next major step in a broader shift at Cape Canaveral, as SpaceX prepares to reshape LC-37 for its Starship launch system as well as at LC-39A.
In both cases, a final Environmental Impact Statement will be released in the coming months for both sites. A draft of the LC-37 EIS was recently released, with findings of No Significant Impact for all ecological, cultural and land use aspects of Starship launches at the site, albeit with one major exception: Starship launches will be the loudest rocket ever launched from the Space Coast, something the Draft EIS noted with its finding of a Significant Impact being the result of Starship launches from Cape Canaveral.
After the debris is cleaned up, new construction can begin in earnest.
Note: Talk of Titusville was unable to create any original photographs of the demolition or its aftermath, as this reporter is western Canada today.
Blue Origin’s CEO, Dave Limp, announced today that the second launch of the company’s New Glenn rocket from Cape Canaveral will be NET August 15, 2025.
Blue Origin’s New Glenn on its debut launch in January. Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville
The mission will have detailed objectives that go beyond mere repetition of its maiden voyage, NG-1. Flight 2 will blend hardware validation with customer service mandates and data acquisition goals — a step toward establishing New Glenn as a frequent-operational vehicle in Earth’s orbit and beyond. It has not been explicitly stated that NG-2 will carry NASA’s ESCAPADE Martian satellites or Blue’s own Blue Moon MK-1 lander but those payloads are possibility.
via X.com
At the center of the NG-2 mission plan is the booster’s recovery. During the January 16 first flight of New Glenn, the seven-engine BE-4-powered first stage demonstrated a nominal ascent, clearing the vehicle to orbital insertion, but it failed to land on its barge deck.
The booster’s descent performance fell short of expectations due to uneven engine tank pressures during a planned restart, and the vehicle was lost during reentry. Blue Origin and the Federal Aviation Administration completed an investigation into the event in March, identifying seven corrective actions tied to propellant management and engine bleed systems to ensure successful recovery in subsequent flights.
Blue Origin’s recovery ship, Jacklyn, while docked in Port Canaveral.
Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville
For Flight 2, Blue Origin intends to validate these fixes and aim for a controlled return and landing on its seagoing platform. Achieving that objective would significantly reduce launch costs and move New Glenn closer to reusability goals — an explicit part of its operational profile.
A second area of focus for Flight 2 is the rocket’s capacity to carry and service client payloads. External contracts from customers such as Amazon’s Kuiper constellation and NASA’s ESCAPADE mission require demonstrated reliability. New Glenn rocket was given NASA Category 1 Certification after NG-1. This classification signifies that the New Glenn is qualified to launch high-risk tolerance missions (Class D). Class D missions typically involve lower priority payloads with medium to low complexity.
Originally manifested on Flight 1, ESCAPADE was reassigned due to integration delays. NASA’s fiscal 2026 budget text indicates it is targeting Flight 2 for launch readiness in quarter four of fiscal 2025 — that is, July through September 2025. That would align with NG-2.
Artist’s rendering of ESCAPADE in orbit over Mars Graphic: NASA
Equally vital is a robust performance of the second stage, known as GS2. That upper stage planned for NG-2 completed a successful hot-fire test in late April, executed at Blue Origin’s facility at their Cape Canaveral’s LC-36 launch complex. The burn, lasting several minutes, engaged the pair of BE-3U engines in conditions representative of vacuum ignition. Flight 2 will aim to repeat and refine this performance, establishing fidelity of orbital insertion timing, orbital stability, and upper-stage restart logic. Any inconsistencies during prolonged burns could compromise payload delivery, a risk Blue Origin must manage to satisfy future clients.
Additional objectives include flight characteristics during ascent. First-stage performance under full-load ascent needs to be validated post investigation, including thrust vector control, separation dynamics, and second‑stage ignition timing. These aspects conducted within uncrewed mission parameters serve to expand the company’s internal flight data metrics and enable iterative design refinement.
New Glenn’s BE-4 engines in flight. Blue Origin plans to test the engine’s restart capabilities on NG-2
Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville
A technical objective of note is Stage 2 restart capability. Flight 1 employed two burns to reach medium earth orbit, with the second occurring about one hour after liftoff. Precise execution of multiple back-to-back burns and control of stage stability across long coast periods will be revisited during Flight 2. Such activity must support more complex orbital insertions or deployments, including geostationary transfer and interplanetary trajectories.
Data gathering is another significant objective for Flight 2. The maiden flight returned telemetry not only from in-flight propulsion and stage performance, but also from the Blue Ring Pathfinder spacecraft, which tested payload-hosting capabilities. Extended duration performance, thermal conditions, avionics interactions, and stage-to-payload stability are all expected to see additional refinement during the second flight. All of these data sets feed directly into Blue Origin’s customer engagement strategy and future flight manifesting. Moreover, the data obtained from the second flight of New Glenn was further inform Blue Origin’s engineers as they refine New Glenn and its operation.
Flight 2 will follow the conclusion of necessary FAA review and re-certification processes. That review probed the booster failure and mandated system updates. Aviation regulators and technical backup teams have signaled that New Glenn is green-lighted to resume flights, provided all identified corrective steps have been applied.
From a strategic perspective, Flight 2 serves as an audition for national security missions in addition to NASA flights. New Glenn received certification for National Security Space Launch Phase 3 Lane 2, positioning the rocket for critical Department of Defense and NRO contracts. Demonstrating reliability in payload delivery booster recovery will determine whether New Glenn becomes a fixture in U.S. strategic payload delivery. Booster performance, booster recovery as well as second stage performance and on-orbit reliability will demonstrate the company’s capabilities.
Timing
One must remain mindful of real-world variables: the weather at Cape Canaveral, barge positioning in the Atlantic, integration timelines for customer payloads, and operational readiness all influence the date. While the August 15th date is the prime target for the flight, Blue Origin will hold as long as needed to preserve mission integrity. The old adage applies here: “Fly when ready. Don’t fly until you are ready.”
Blue Origin New Glenn on the launch mount at LC-36. Photo: Charles Boyer / Talk of Titusville.
What’s At Stake?
Flight 2, then, is a multifaceted test: a demonstration of recovery, payload delivery, propulsion resilience, and market viability. Beyond the hardware itself, the logistical and regulatory choreography behind the scene also comes under real-world assessment. Each objective supports a broader ambition to match cadence, reliability, and cost-competitiveness with established launch providers.
Should Flight 2 proceed as scripted, Blue Origin expects to build momentum toward the next six to eight missions planned through 2026. Those future missions include dual-launch capabilities, potential crewed flight compatibility, and more specialized interplanetary trajectories. But all of that depends on fixing what didn’t stick in Flight 1 and proving that New Glenn can operate reliably and repeatedly.
The Department of the Air Force has released its Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which reviews the proposed repurposing of Launch Complex 37 (LC-37) for Starship launches at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS).
LC-37 At was used until recently by United Launch Alliance for Delta IV Heavy, with the last launch coming fourteen months ago when the last Delta IV Heavy built by ULA flew the NROL-70 for the National Reconnaissance Office.
At A Glance – A High Level Summary Of The Impacts
Talk of Titusville is still reading the document, which spans hundreds of pages.
The Draft outlines the anticipated environmental effects of permitting SpaceX to conduct up to 76 Starship launches and landings per year at the site, along with associated construction, fueling, testing, and transportation activities. The document also represents the most detailed public blueprint to date of SpaceX’s plans for regular Starship operations in Florida.
Noise Impacts
A map shows the Noise Contours for a typical Starship launch. Also from the Draft:
Noise Impact Mitigations
From page 12 of the Executive Summary Noise Impact Mitigation:
Mitigation-3 is interesting — if it can be proven that sound damage from Starship has resulted in property damage, under Federal law, SpaceX is responsible for making the property owner whole again.
You must be logged in to post a comment.